Skip to content
Andree LeBoeuf Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Andree LeBoeuf Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$415kPhilanthropy$400kHealth$200kEducation$150kYouth Development$115kFood & Nutrition$50kInternational$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART BOSTON$120,000
MASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN FOUNDATION$35,000
BOSTON PUBLIC ART TRIENNIAL INC$25,000
ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC$15,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON$10,000
THE CLEAR FUND DBA GIVEWELL$10,000
PROVINCETOWN PUBLIC ART FOUNDATION$7,500
FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC: $8k → 8%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN FOUNDATION: $35k → 16%THE CLEAR FUND DBA GIVEWELL: $10k → 10%Institute of Contemporary Art: $50k → 10%UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT: $100k → 10%PALAVER STRINGS: $20k → 7%PROVINCETOWN PUBLIC ART FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%Massachusetts College of Art and Design Foundation: $35k → 16%UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT: $100k → 10%Museum of Fine Arts Boston: $33k → 16%UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT: $100k → 10%Museum of Fine Arts Boston: $32k → 16%UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT: $100k → 10%Massachusetts College of Art and Design Foundation: $30k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO: $50k → 10%MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON: $10k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO: $50k → 10%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $30k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO: $50k → 10%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $10k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO: $50k → 10%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $5k → 16%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $5k → 16%BOSTON PUBLIC ART TRIENNIAL INC: $25k → 16%INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART BOSTON: $120k → 16%Institute of Contemporary Art: $110k → 16%ARTIST FOR HUMANITY INC: $50k → 16%ARTIST FOR HUMANITY INC: $50k → 16%ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 8 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+83%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $400k · revenue +11%
  • THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $230k · revenue +31%
  • AF
    ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IO
    Institute of Contemporary Art
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • PS
    PALAVER STRINGS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Guild of Boston Artists Inc
—
2
Boston Arts Summer Institute Inc
Recreation & Sports
3
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
4
The Broad Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
5
The William a Farnsworth Library and Art Museum Inc

The museum's mission is to celebrate maine's role in american art. to accomplish that mission the museum provides an extensive offering of collections, exhibitions, education and retail services to the general public.

Arts & Culture
6
Ellis-Beauregard Foundation
Arts & Culture
7
United Artist Collaborative
Arts & Culture
8
Berggruen Institute
Education
9
The Florence Center for Contemporary Music
Arts & Culture
10
Boston Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
12
International Contemporary Art Foundatio
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts College of Art and Design Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The University of Vermont Medical Center Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INC: $400,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT IN…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $230,000 · Arts & CultureTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART …ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $115,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INCBOSTON PUBLIC ART TRIENNIAL INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON PUBLIC ART TRIENNIAL INCPALAVER STRINGS INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMassachusetts College of Art and Design Foundation Inc: $100,000 · OtherMassachusetts College of Ar…Museum of Fine Arts Boston: $74,500 · OtherMuseum of Fine Arts BostonInstitute of Contemporary Art: $50,000 · OtherInstitute of Contemporary A…GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK IN…TRUSTEES OF TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF TUFTS UNIVERSIT…THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · HealthTHE UNIVERSITY O…
Philanthropy$410,000Arts & Culture$405,000Other$324,500Health$200,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INC: $400,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $230,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $115,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMassachusetts College of Art and Design Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON PUBLIC ART TRIENNIAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPALAVER STRINGS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVINCETOWN PUBLIC ART FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetFINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Boston Foundation IncMA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andree LeBoeuf Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andree LeBoeuf Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Artists for Humanity Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Andree LeBoeuf Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Andree LeBoeuf Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Andree LeBoeuf’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home