Skip to content
Anderson Community Partners at a glance

· Private foundation

Anderson Community Partners

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$833k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$3.7MHuman Services$2.0MHealth$1.3MYouth Development$375kPhilanthropy$100kHousing & Shelter$40kEnvironment$35kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION$833,333
CITY OF HOPE$300,000
STARS & STRIPES CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$250,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE INLAND EMPIRE INC$50,000
BAGLY INC$10,000
MARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE INLAND EMPIRE INC$10,000
WISEPLACE$10,000
SHATTERPROOF$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC$5,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED INC$5,000
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
STARS & STRIPES CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $318k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S FUND: $3k → 14%PROJECT 150: $25 → 13%STARS & STRIPES CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $250k → 10%STARS & STRIPES CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%WISEPLACE: $10k → 10%WISEPLACE: $10k → 10%TONY'S TREEHOUSE: $15k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
CT
CA
CO
TN
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 12 repeat orgs$863k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$6.6M
$853k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+26%

Still filing today

67%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    STARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue ×12
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $100k · revenue +54%
  • TS
    THE SHAQUILLE O'NEAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $65k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SA
    SAMUELI ACADEMY ORANGEWOOD CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $333k
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +35%
  • TM
    THE MOONRIDGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
California State University Long Beach Research Foundation

Serves the mission of the university by supporting and engaging in research, entrepreneurship, community service, sponsored programs and the acquisition of private resources.

Education
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
7
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
10
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
11
Cal State Fullerton Philanthropic Foundation

To actively promote, pursue and steward private support for the advancement of california state university, fullerton.

Philanthropy
12
Santa Barbara Foundation

The mission of the santa barbara foundation (sbf) is to mobilize collective wisdom and philanthropic capital to build empathetic, inclusive and resilient communities.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tony's Treehouse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION: $3,333,332 · EducationUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION+3 more: $40,000 · EducationSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,966,550 · Human ServicesSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S F…+6 more: $62,525 · Human ServicesCITY OF HOPE: $885,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPESAMUELI ACADEMY ORANGEWOOD CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $333,333 · OtherSAMUELI ACADEMY ORANGEWO…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE INLAND EMPIRE: $160,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC: $100,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS…+8 more: $115,304 · Other+8 moreCITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $300,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $20,000 · HealthMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthTHE MOONRIDGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SHAQUILLE O'NEAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,500 · Environment
Education$3,373,332Human Services$2,029,075Other$1,593,637Health$345,000Philanthropy$100,000Youth Development$65,000Environment$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION: $3,333,332 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,966,550 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetCITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOONRIDGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SHAQUILLE O'NEAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBAGLY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPacific Oaks Education Corporation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISEPLACE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAMUELI ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSBCS CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…The Ayco Charitable F…Jewish Community Foun…Sisters of St Joseph …Charities Aid Foundat…Edwards Lifesciences …Sempra FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…The Blackbaud Giving …National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…
Orange County Community FoundationCA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Orange County · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anderson Community Partners funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anderson Community Partners. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Bagly Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anderson Community Partners?

Find your warmest path to Anderson Community Partners through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anderson Community Partners’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home