Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

San Diego Social Venture Partners Inc

The mission of AMPLIFIED IMPACT PARTNERS is to mobilize talented individuals to partner with nonprofits, strengthening organizations and amplifying community impact.

$50k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.

Youth Development$75kCrime & Legal$75kEducation$48kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$25kEmployment$25kArts & Culture$25kHealth$15kOther$25k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOGAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVEL$25,000
VOICES OF OUR CITY CHOIR$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HANNAHS HOUSE: $25k → 11%PAVING GREAT FUTURES: $25k → 11%BURN INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%TRAVELING STORIES: $15k → 11%LOGAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVEL: $25k → 11%KITCHENS FOR GOOD: $25k → 11%OUTDOOR OUTREACH: $25k → 11%DIAMOND EDU EXCELLENCE PSHIP: $8k → 11%CASA CORNELIA LAW CENTER: $25k → 11%BILATERAL SAFETY CORRID COAL: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
2
San Diegans for Health Care Coverage

Promote Access to Health Care for all San Diegans

Health
3
Border Angels

We advocate for human rights humane immigration reform and social justice. Our efforts aim to reduce fatalities along the US-Mexico border by educating and assisting communities on both sides. Our services include educational programs…

Human Services
4
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
5
Arts Education Connection San Diego

Arts Education Connection San Diego engages professional teaching artists to provide high-quality arts education programs in all art forms for students, educators, families and communities, advocating for, leading and advancing education…

Arts & Culture
6
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
7
Voices of Tomorrow

To provide culturally responsive, child-focused programs that support the growth, learning, and well-being of children and families. To strengthen community-based systems by empowering providers to deliver equitable........

Youth Development
8
Bridging Cultural Gaps

Successfully supported the underrepresented East African Community with BSK Grant. Supported included student well- being and success by improving school climate and advocating for alternative discipline in the school system.

Arts & Culture
9
Coastwalk

To ensure the right of the public to access and respectfully enjoy the California Coast. To work for the completion of the California Coastal Trail and to educate the public about the coast and ocean resources.

—
10
Travelers Aid Society of San Diego

Providing connections and solutions that prevent or address crisis.

Human Services
11
Center for Community Advocacy

Provide Educational Programs, Health Services and Legal Services to Farm Workers at housing sites and throughout the Salinas Valley and promote improved living conditions.

—
12
Healthy Relationships California

Healthy Relationships California works to improve the well-being of children by strengthening the relationship of parents by participating in marriage education and relationship skill classes.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Cornelia Legal Services and the most unlike its peers is Cesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Cesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentCesar Chavez Service Club…OUTDOOR OUTREACH — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentOUTDOOR OUTREACHBilateral Safety Corridor Coalition — $50,000 · Crime & LegalBilateral Safety Corridor…Casa Cornelia Legal Services — $25,000 · Crime & LegalCasa Cornelia Legal Servi…HANNAHS FAMILY CENTER — $25,000 · EducationHANNAHS FAMILY …Traveling Stories — $15,000 · EducationTraveling Stori…Diamond Educational Excellence Partnership — $7,500 · EducationDiamond Educati…KITCHENS FOR GOOD — $25,000 · OtherKITCHENS FOR GOODVOICES OF OUR CITY CHOIR INC — $25,000 · OtherVOICES OF OUR CITY CH…AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 3 — $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN ACADEMY OF P…Burn Institute — $25,000 · PhilanthropyDREAMS FOR CHANGE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesPAVING GREAT FUTURES — $25,000 · Employment
Youth Development$75,000Crime & Legal$75,000Education$47,500Other$65,000Philanthropy$25,000Human Services$25,000Employment$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetBilateral Safety Corridor Coalition — $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBurn Institute — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHANNAHS FAMILY CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetDREAMS FOR CHANGE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPAVING GREAT FUTURES — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetOUTDOOR OUTREACH — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCasa Cornelia Legal Services — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVOICES OF OUR CITY CHOIR INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTraveling Stories — $15,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 3 — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDiamond Educational Excellence Partnership — $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego Foundat…Sempra FoundationPrice Philanthropies …The Conrad Prebys Fou…Jewish Community Foun…Alliance Healthcare F…The Parker FoundationThe Cushman FoundationDavid C Copley Founda…Rancho Santa Fe Found…The Nordson Corporati…Boys and Girls Aid So…
The San Diego FoundationCA27.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The Parker Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Diego Social Venture Partners Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines