Skip to content
San Diego Social Venture Partners Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

San Diego Social Venture Partners Inc

The mission of AMPLIFIED IMPACT PARTNERS is to mobilize talented individuals to partner with nonprofits, strengthening organizations and amplifying community impact.

$50k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Crime & Legal$75kYouth Development$75kHuman Services$50kHealth$40kFood & Nutrition$25kEmployment$25kHousing & Shelter$25kEducation$23k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOICES OF OUR CITY CHOIR$25,000
LOGAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVEL$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HANNAHS HOUSE: $25k → 11%PAVING GREAT FUTURES: $25k → 11%BURN INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%TRAVELING STORIES: $15k → 11%LOGAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVEL: $25k → 11%KITCHENS FOR GOOD: $25k → 11%OUTDOOR OUTREACH: $25k → 11%DIAMOND EDU EXCELLENCE PSHIP: $8k → 11%CASA CORNELIA LAW CENTER: $25k → 11%BILATERAL SAFETY CORRID COAL: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
2
San Diegans for Health Care Coverage

Promote Access to Health Care for all San Diegans

Health
3
Border Angels

We advocate for human rights humane immigration reform and social justice. Our efforts aim to reduce fatalities along the US-Mexico border by educating and assisting communities on both sides. Our services include educational programs…

Human Services
4
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
5
Arts Education Connection San Diego

Arts Education Connection San Diego engages professional teaching artists to provide high-quality arts education programs in all art forms for students, educators, families and communities, advocating for, leading and advancing education…

Arts & Culture
6
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
7
Voices of Tomorrow

To provide culturally responsive, child-focused programs that support the growth, learning, and well-being of children and families. To strengthen community-based systems by empowering providers to deliver equitable........

Youth Development
8
Bridging Cultural Gaps

Successfully supported the underrepresented East African Community with BSK Grant. Supported included student well- being and success by improving school climate and advocating for alternative discipline in the school system.

Arts & Culture
9
Coastwalk

To ensure the right of the public to access and respectfully enjoy the California Coast. To work for the completion of the California Coastal Trail and to educate the public about the coast and ocean resources.

—
10
Travelers Aid Society of San Diego

Providing connections and solutions that prevent or address crisis.

Human Services
11
Center for Community Advocacy

Provide Educational Programs, Health Services and Legal Services to Farm Workers at housing sites and throughout the Salinas Valley and promote improved living conditions.

—
12
Healthy Relationships California

Healthy Relationships California works to improve the well-being of children by strengthening the relationship of parents by participating in marriage education and relationship skill classes.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Cornelia Legal Services; the most unlike its peers is Cesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentCesar Chavez Service Club…OUTDOOR OUTREACH: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentOUTDOOR OUTREACHBilateral Safety Corridor Coalition: $50,000 · Crime & LegalBilateral Safety Corridor…Casa Cornelia Legal Services: $25,000 · Crime & LegalCasa Cornelia Legal Servi…HANNAHS FAMILY CENTER: $25,000 · EducationHANNAHS FAMILY …Traveling Stories: $15,000 · EducationTraveling Stori…Diamond Educational Excellence Partnership: $7,500 · EducationDiamond Educati…PAVING GREAT FUTURES: $25,000 · EmploymentKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $25,000 · OtherKITCHENS FOR GOODVOICES OF OUR CITY CHOIR INC: $25,000 · OtherVOICES OF OUR CITY CH…AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 3: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN ACADEMY OF P…DREAMS FOR CHANGE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesBurn Institute: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Youth Development$75,000Crime & Legal$75,000Education$47,500Employment$25,000Other$65,000Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetBilateral Safety Corridor Coalition: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHANNAHS FAMILY CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPAVING GREAT FUTURES: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDREAMS FOR CHANGE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetOUTDOOR OUTREACH: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCasa Cornelia Legal Services: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBurn Institute: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetVOICES OF OUR CITY CHOIR INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTraveling Stories: $15,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 3: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDiamond Educational Excellence Partnership: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego Foundat…Sempra FoundationPrice Philanthropies …The Conrad Prebys Fou…Jewish Community Foun…Alliance Healthcare F…The Parker FoundationThe Cushman FoundationDavid C Copley Founda…Rancho Santa Fe Found…The Nordson Corporati…Boys and Girls Aid So…
The San Diego FoundationCA27.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The Parker Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Diego Social Venture Partners Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Diego Social Venture Partners Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Diego Social Venture Partners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home