How much did Amgis Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of Amgis Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

genessee orleans

2022

genessee orleans

2023

ministry

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k11 grants · $64k
$10k–50k7 grants · $116k

$7,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

Cincinnati Childrens Hospital$25,000
Response to Love Center$20,000
Nativity Miguel$20,000
Cabinet of Curisoty$15,750
Genessee Orleans Ministry of Concern$12,000
Arc of Genesee Orleans$12,000
Snow City Arts$11,250
Ronald McDonald House$7,000
Hands 4 Hope Street Ministry$7,000
Beds for Brian$7,000
Care Net Center of Greater Orleans$7,000
Hair & Hope Foundation$6,750
St Giles ASP$6,750
Karen Wellington Foundation$5,000
Lockport Robotics$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$992k · 24 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$992k

$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%

+78%

Still filing today

33%

44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CN
Care Net Center of Greater Orleans
4× · 2021–2024 · $47k · revenue +46%
ET
Explore Their Stories
4× · 2020–2023 · $39k · revenue +39% · 86% of their budget
OR
Orleans Renaissance Group
2× · 2019–2020 · $38k · revenue +6%

Funded once

CT
Calvary Tabernacle Church
one grant, 2021 · $30k
Heart Love and Soulgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +53%
UW
United Way of Orleans County
one grant, 2023 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster

Goodwill of Central & Southern Indiana

[see schedule o]goodwill of central and southern indiana offers a variety of employment, education and health services geared toward helping individuals and families become economically self-sufficient.

Employment

Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc

to create affordable housing solutions for people with low and moderate incomes, and collaborate to enhance the quality of life in Indianapolis neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter

Harvest House

Food Security

Human Services

The Houston Food Bank

The mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided 123 million nutritious meals in 18 counties through our 1,600 community partners.

—

ReNew Htown Inc

ReNew HTown, Inc. is an organization that is committed to helping sex trafficking survivors transition to independent living. We do this by decorating homes with new

Human Services

Infinite Possibilities Inc

IPS mission is to aid in rental, utility, food, clothing , hygiene, and case management services and to prevent the displacement of families also to provide to families who are at risk of being unsheltered and provides subsistence services

Youth Development

Arins Nesting Place

To provide resources and services to educate, empoyer, and promote healthy relationships, to revitalize the community and to heal the effects of domestic violence.

Human Services

Aarons Place Inc

Our mission is to help meet the basic human needs of underserved people with respect affirming an individuals dignity while addressing the root problems which perpetuate the cycle of poverty regardless of race ethnicity sexual orientation…

Food & Nutrition

United Way of Greater Cincinnati

The UWGC Foundation provides a flexible vehicle to perpetuate financial support of UWGC, its initiatives, its agencies, and the human services they provide.

Philanthropy

Heart of Putnam Food Pantry Inc

Providing food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition

Red Door Food Pantry Inc

The red door food pantry exists to provide food assistance to those experiencing food insecurity in bartow county, georgia.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart Love & Soul Inc and the most unlike its peers is Freestore Foodbank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

11/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$936,750Arts & Culture$77,000Food & Nutrition$46,000Education$29,250Human Services$17,000Youth Development$10,000Environment$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA4.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Amgis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Explore Their Stories.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 811740466 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Explore Their Stories, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 86% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Amgis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Amgis Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Amgis Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Amgis Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Amgis Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Amgis Foundation?

More from the funding graph