Skip to content
Amga Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Amga Foundation Inc

To foster quality improvement in group practice through education and research programs in clinical quality, patient safety, service, operational efficiency and innovation.

$173k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$455kEducation$148k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $20,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $172,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $152,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIMED HEALTH LLC$10,000
PREVEA HEALTH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAHEY CLINICAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK LLC: $5k → 8%METHODIST PHYSICIANS CLINIC: $5k → 12%OLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 9%CENTRACARE HEALTH - ST CLOUD HOSPITAL: $5k → 11%ESSENTIA HEALTH: $5k → 15%GEISINGER CLINIC: $5k → 10%EXCELA HEALTH PHYSICIAN PRACTICES INC: $5k → 10%PREMIER MEDICAL ASSOCIATES: $15k → 11%UPMC SUSQUEHANNA HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP: $5k → 12%PINNACLEHEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%GUTHRIE CLINIC: $10k → 12%PAMFRI: $5k → 8%SCRIPPS MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INSTITUTE (ELSEGUNDO: $10k → 14%WESTMED MEDICAL GROUP: $5k → 9%KS MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC: $5k → 10%AUSTIN ARIA INC: $5k → 10%MCNT PLLC: $5k → 14%BOARD OF REGENTS UNIV OF OKLAHOMA: $5k → 16%WATSON CLINIC: $5k → 16%SIMED HEALTH LLC: $10k → 19%IOWA CLINIC PC: $15k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (GREEN ROAD): $5k → 14%MERCY EAST COMMUNITIES: $15k → 11%THEDACARE: $5k → 7%PREVEA HEALTH: $15k → 10%AURORA HEALTH CARE: $12k → 17%WELLMONT MEDICAL ASSOCIATES: $5k → 15%COASTAL CAROLINA HEALTH CARE PA: $5k → 14%FORSYTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE: $6k → 8%POLYCLINIC: $5k → 9%SENTARA MEDICAL GROUP (NORFOLK): $9k → 19%SOUTHWEST MEDICAL ASSOCIATES: $10k → 13%OCHSNER HEALTH: $10k → 15%TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10k → 23%PREMIER MEDICAL ASSOCIATES: $8k → 10%PREMIER MEDICAL ASSISTANCE: $13k → 11%GUTHRIE CLINIC: $10k → 12%HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INSTITUTE (ELSEGUNDO: $10k → 14%SIMED HEALTH LLC: $10k → 19%IOWA CLINIC PC: $10k → 5%MERCY EAST COMMUNITIES: $15k → 11%PREVEA HEALTH: $10k → 10%AURORA HEALTH CARE: $10k → 17%FORSYTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10k → 23%NORTON MEDICAL GROUP: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
NE
MO
KY
VA
TN
NC
OK
LA
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$409k · 18 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
36

Total granted

$409k
$194k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+41%

Still filing today

72%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MERCY CLINIC EAST COMMUNITIES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $40k · revenue +134%
  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +62%
  • SV
    St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s
    3× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • SM
    SOUTHWEST MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • OH
    Ochsner Health System
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SM
    SENTARA MEDICAL GROUP (NORFOLK)
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
4
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
9
Vassar Brothers Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
10
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
11
Medical Park Hospital Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
12
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Mississippi Medical Clinics Inc; the most unlike its peers is Healthcare Partners Institute for. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PREMIER MEDICAL ASSOCIATES: $40,800 · OtherPREMIER MEDICAL ASSOCIATESMERCY CLINIC EAST COMMUNITIES: $40,000 · OtherMERCY CLINIC EAST COMMUNITIESAHS OKLAHOMA PHYSICIAN GROUP LLC: $30,000 · OtherAHS OKLAHOMA PHYSICIAN GROUP LLCIOWA CLINIC PC: $30,000 · OtherIOWA CLINIC PCSIMEDHEALTH LLC: $20,000 · OtherSIMEDHEALTH LLCWenatchee Valley Hospital: $20,000 · OtherWenatchee Valley Hospital+22 more: $129,000 · Other+22 moreTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONSt Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s: $30,000 · HealthSt Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of …AURORA HEALTH CARE INC: $21,500 · HealthAURORA HEALTH CARE INCFORSYTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthFORSYTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONTHE GUTHRIE CLINIC: $20,000 · HealthTHE GUTHRIE CLINICCOMMUNITY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC: $15,800 · HealthCOMMUNITY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INCSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $15,500 · HealthSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATIONOLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 · HealthOLMSTED MEDICAL CENTEROCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+15 more: $75,000 · Health+15 moreHEALTHCARE PARTNERS INSTITUTE FOR: $20,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $20,000 · Education
Other$309,800Health$252,800Education$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY CLINIC EAST COMMUNITIES: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE INC: $21,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE PARTNERS INSTITUTE FOR: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORSYTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWenatchee Valley Hospital: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GUTHRIE CLINIC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC: $15,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHYSICIANS CLINIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENNEDY MEDICAL GROUP PRACTICE PC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST CLOUD HOSPITAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOVANT MEDICAL GROUP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY PHYSICIANS SERVICES PC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwedishAmerican Hospital: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENTARA MEDICAL GROUP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESSENTIA HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThedaCare Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CLINICS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellmont Medical Associates Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reach Out and Read IncAmerican Cancer Socie…Alliance for Clinical…Mayo ClinicAmerican Heart Associ…Muscular Dystrophy As…The Children's Hospit…Donor Advised Charita…
Reach Out and Read IncMA20.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation · Mayo Clinic · American Heart Association Inc · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amga Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amga Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Valley Physicians Services Pc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Amga’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home