· Private foundation
Ameritino Foundation (The)
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| RANCHO BUENA VISTA HIGH SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| ELEMENTARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE | $5,000 |
| DOORS OF CHANGE | $5,000 |
| SAN MARCOS MIDDLE SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| EMILIO NARES FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $5,000 |
| CARDIFF SOCCER LEAGUE | $4,000 |
| SOLANA BEACH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $3,500 |
| LONGMONT HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES | $2,500 |
| CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| SAN ELIJO MIDDLE SCHOOL | $1,500 |
| THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES5× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +157%- MKMAMA'S KITCHEN5× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +103%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC3× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- STSAVE THE CHILDREN (MEXICO)one grant, 2017 · $5k
- BTBoys to Men Mentoring Network Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +69%
- LOLEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS (UVALDE FUND)one grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…
The purpose of providing legal representation and advocacy to foster children and youth in the San Diego County courts.
San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…
We advocate for human rights humane immigration reform and social justice. Our efforts aim to reduce fatalities along the US-Mexico border by educating and assisting communities on both sides. Our services include educational programs…
Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.
The mission of San Luis Obispo CASA (SLO CASA) is to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children within the dependency court system. CASA recruits, trains, and supervises volunteers who advocate for this vulnerable…
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
The court appointed special advocates (casa) program recruits, trains, and supports volunteer advocates to support abused and neglected children during the court process, to help every child find a permanent home and complete their…
Dreams for Change's mission is to respond to the needs of San Diegans by creating innovative and cost-effective programs to empower and stabilize the lives of under-served families and individuals.
The mission of san diego volunteer lawyer program, inc. is to provide equal access to the justice system by serving as a bridge between indigent and other disadvantaged people in san diego county and the volunteer lawyers who are willing…
The mission of crisis house is to respond immediately to stop the cycle of domestic violence and homelessness and to connect families and individuals to crucial resources that empower them to renew their lives.
Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef) is a next-generation social justice law firm that defends our immigrant communities against injustices in the immigration system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
- Who funds MAMA'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds Doors of Change ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CARDIFF SOCCER LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds Emilio Nares Foundation ↗
- Who funds ELEMENTARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Casa Cornelia Legal Services ↗
- Who funds North County LGBTQ Resource Center ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS ↗
- Who funds GALILEE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN MARCOS PROMISE ↗
- Who funds Hogar Infantil Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds House of Mexico ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc ↗
- Who funds CARITAS ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FEDERATION OF WOMEN DBA WOMANS CLUB OF VISTA ↗
- Who funds PARENT INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds San Diego Council on Literacy ↗
- Who funds BARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Bilateral Safety Corridor Coalition ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Bravo Foundation · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · The Parker Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Cushman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ameritino Foundation (The) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ameritino Foundation (The)?
Find your warmest path to Ameritino Foundation (The) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.