Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Symphony Orchestra League D/B/A League of American Orchestras

To advance the experience of orchestral music, support the people and organizations that create it, and champion the contributions they make to the health and vibrancy of communities.

$545k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$8.6MEducation$173kYouth Development$20kOther$476k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19 grants below total $480,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $545,443 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,443 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$25,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATLANTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$30,000
KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
SOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
ORCHESTRA LUMOS$25,000
CHICAGO PHILHARMONIC$25,000
LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA$25,000
WINSTON-SALEM SYMPHONY$25,000
JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY$25,000
NAPA VALLEY YOUTH SYMPHONY$25,000
SYMPHONY TACOMA$25,000
WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$25,000
NEW JERSEY SYMPHONY$25,000
SAN DIEGO YOUTH SYMPHONY$25,000
WALLA WALLA SYMPHONY$25,000
GREATER CONNECTICUT YOUTH ORCHESTRAS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 16%MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $75k → 11%THE SAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY: $75k → 14%SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $75k → 10%SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 11%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSN: $75k → 14%DALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 14%HOUSTON SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $75k → 16%DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 21%UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $75k → 8%CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 16%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 16%MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $75k → 11%THE SAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY: $75k → 14%SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $75k → 10%SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 11%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $75k → 14%DALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 14%HOUSTON SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $75k → 16%DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 21%OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $75k → 12%NASHVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $75k → 14%UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $75k → 8%CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 16%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION DBA THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $75k → 17%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 16%MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $75k → 11%SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $75k → 10%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $75k → 14%DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 21%OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $75k → 12%NASHVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $75k → 14%MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION: $75k → 17%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 16%MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $75k → 11%SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $75k → 10%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $75k → 14%DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 21%NASHVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $75k → 14%NASHVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $75k → 14%AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA: $65k → 17%AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA: $52k → 17%AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA 494 8TH AVENUE STE 503 NEW YORK NY 10001: $52k → 17%AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA: $52k → 17%NEW YORK PHILARMONIC: $75k → 17%NEW YORK PHILARMONIC: $75k → 17%NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC: $75k → 17%NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.0M · 85 repeat orgs$325k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

85 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 66 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

85
19

Total granted

$9.0M
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $445k · revenue +115%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $363k · revenue +14%
  • NS
    Nashville Symphony Association
    4× · 2017–2020 · $344k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CS
    CHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -37%
  • PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -15%
  • TL
    THE LOUISIANA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
2
New Amsterdam Symphony Orchestra

Advancement of the art of music and public knowledge therefor by producing performances. Featuring emerging conductors and musical soloists.

Arts & Culture
3
Georgia Symphony Orchestra

The Georgia Symphony Orchestra GSO is a non-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing significant cultural and educational value to the north-metro Atlanta community. The organization performs public concerts through our…

4
Wheeling Symphony Orchestra
5
Olympia Symphony Orchestra

To provide the highest quality live music to enrich educate and entertain an expanding audience.

6
Concerto Soloists Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia

To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…

Arts & Culture
7
Warminster Symphony Society

Performs classical music for the community

8
Orlando Philharmonic
9
Sedona Symphony

The Sedona Symphony is committed to enriching the quality of life of our Northern Arizona community through the power of live orchestral music that educates, entertains, and inspires. From timeless classics to bold contemporary works, the…

Arts & Culture
10
Annapolis Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the annapolis symphony orchestra is to inspire, educate and enrich lives near and far by creating extraordinary musical experiences with uncompromising artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
11
Seattle Youth Symphony Orchestras

Empowering youth through excellence in orchestral education.

Arts & Culture
12
Tucson Symphony Society

The mission of the Tucson Symphony is to build and enrich community through the experience of live music of the highest quality.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Symphony Orchestra Association and the most unlike its peers is Inner City Youth Orchrstra of Los Angeles Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 62 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%59%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%72%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/104
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,461

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
103/104
Grantees still filing
72/104
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC — $444,500 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $393,760 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $363,260 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $346,260 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $343,760 · Arts & CultureNashville Symphony Association — $343,760 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $335,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $324,500 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $300,000 · Arts & Culture+82 more — $5,421,905 · Arts & Culture+82 moreYOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO — $135,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO YOUTH SYMPHONY & CONSERVATORY — $120,000 · OtherTHE WHARTON INSTITUTE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $69,760 · OtherNATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC — $30,000 · OtherFOX VALLEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION INC — $30,000 · OtherTHE CENTRAL OHIO SYMPHONY INC — $30,000 · OtherLIMA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · OtherLENAWEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $19,500 · Other+2 more — $12,000 · OtherNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC — $143,260 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · EducationOREGON BRAVO YOUTH ORCHESTRAS — $19,500 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$8,616,705Other$476,260Education$173,260Youth Development$19,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC — $444,500 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $393,760 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $363,260 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $346,260 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $343,760 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNashville Symphony Association — $343,760 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $335,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $324,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $300,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $213,260 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HAVEN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $179,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetOREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $175,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society — $175,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $169,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST LUKES CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INC — $160,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association — $152,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Symphony Society — $150,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA — $150,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC — $143,260 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO — $135,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetVIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $133,260 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY — $123,760 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY — $123,760 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSAN DIEGO YOUTH SYMPHONY & CONSERVATORY — $120,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSYMPHONY TACOMA — $105,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetALBANY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $105,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPacific Symphony — $98,760 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $93,760 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNEW JERSEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $93,760 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTHE RICHMOND SYMPHONY — $92,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetKNOXVILLE SYMPHONY SOCIETY INCORPORATED — $82,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $80,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEugene Symphony Association Inc — $80,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $80,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPORTLAND MAINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $80,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC — $75,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetORCHESTRA LUMOS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWalla Walla Symphony Society Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC — $75,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetWINSTON-SALEM SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER CONNECTICUT YOUTH ORCHESTRAS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS — $74,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE WHARTON INSTITUTE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $69,760 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHICAGO SINFONIETTA INC — $63,770 over 4y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Music USA IncNY31.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Music USA Inc · D'Addario Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · The Amphion Foundation Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · The Aaron Copland Fund for Music Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · Ann & Gordon Getty Foundation · Clarence E Heller Charitable Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Rea Charitable Trust · The Klarman Family Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Bruckner Society of America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Symphony Orchestra League D/B/A League of American Orchestras funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • New Jersey Symphony Orchestra21% of income from government
  • The Boston Landmarks Orchestra Inc9% of income from government
  • Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc4% of income from government
  • Boston Modern Orchestra Project Inc4% of income from government
  • New Haven Symphony Orchestra Inc3% of income from government
  • Handel and Haydn Society2% of income from government
  • Eugene Symphony Association Inc2% of income from government
  • Greater Connecticut Youth Orchestras Inc1% of income from government
  • Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc1% of income from government
  • Orchestra Lumos Inc1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc0% of income from government
  • New World Symphony Inc0% of income from government
  • Oregon Symphony Association0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph