· Public charity
American Symphony Orchestra League D/B/A League of American Orchestras
To advance the experience of orchestral music, support the people and organizations that create it, and champion the contributions they make to the health and vibrancy of communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $480,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $545,443 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,443 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ATLANTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $30,000 |
| KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $25,000 |
| SOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $25,000 |
| ORCHESTRA LUMOS | $25,000 |
| CHICAGO PHILHARMONIC | $25,000 |
| LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA | $25,000 |
| WINSTON-SALEM SYMPHONY | $25,000 |
| JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY | $25,000 |
| NAPA VALLEY YOUTH SYMPHONY | $25,000 |
| SYMPHONY TACOMA | $25,000 |
| WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA | $25,000 |
| NEW JERSEY SYMPHONY | $25,000 |
| SAN DIEGO YOUTH SYMPHONY | $25,000 |
| WALLA WALLA SYMPHONY | $25,000 |
| GREATER CONNECTICUT YOUTH ORCHESTRAS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
85 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 66 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $445k · revenue +115%
- LALOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION5× · 2017–2021 · $363k · revenue +14%
- NSNashville Symphony Association4× · 2017–2020 · $344k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- CSCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -37%
PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -15%- TLTHE LOUISIANA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…
Advancement of the art of music and public knowledge therefor by producing performances. Featuring emerging conductors and musical soloists.
The Georgia Symphony Orchestra GSO is a non-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing significant cultural and educational value to the north-metro Atlanta community. The organization performs public concerts through our…
To provide the highest quality live music to enrich educate and entertain an expanding audience.
To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…
Performs classical music for the community
The Sedona Symphony is committed to enriching the quality of life of our Northern Arizona community through the power of live orchestral music that educates, entertains, and inspires. From timeless classics to bold contemporary works, the…
The mission of the annapolis symphony orchestra is to inspire, educate and enrich lives near and far by creating extraordinary musical experiences with uncompromising artistic excellence.
Empowering youth through excellence in orchestral education.
The mission of the Tucson Symphony is to build and enrich community through the experience of live music of the highest quality.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Symphony Orchestra Association and the most unlike its peers is Inner City Youth Orchrstra of Los Angeles Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 62 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds Nashville Symphony Association ↗
- Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVEN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ST LUKES CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
- Who funds Houston Symphony Society ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds HANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO YOUTH SYMPHONY & CONSERVATORY ↗
- Who funds SYMPHONY TACOMA ↗
- Who funds ALBANY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Pacific Symphony ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds THE RICHMOND SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds KNOXVILLE SYMPHONY SOCIETY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Eugene Symphony Association Inc ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND MAINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds ORCHESTRA LUMOS INC ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Music USA Inc · D'Addario Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · The Amphion Foundation Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · The Aaron Copland Fund for Music Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · Ann & Gordon Getty Foundation · Clarence E Heller Charitable Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Rea Charitable Trust · The Klarman Family Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Bruckner Society of America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Symphony Orchestra League D/B/A League of American Orchestras funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Jersey Symphony Orchestra — 21% of income from government
- The Boston Landmarks Orchestra Inc — 9% of income from government
- Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc — 4% of income from government
- Boston Modern Orchestra Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- New Haven Symphony Orchestra Inc — 3% of income from government
- Handel and Haydn Society — 2% of income from government
- Eugene Symphony Association Inc — 2% of income from government
- Greater Connecticut Youth Orchestras Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc — 1% of income from government
- Orchestra Lumos Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Symphony Association — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.