How much did AMERICAN HOMELAND TITLE COMMUNITY grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of AMERICAN HOMELAND TITLE COMMUNITY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

researchwomenshelter

2021

careillsheltersfosterrecoverystudentsmental health

2022

benefitsyouthhelpshomeless

2023

helps

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $20k
$10k–50k1 grant · $29k

$1,766

Median grant

States reached

$15k

Total assets

Largest grants

ST PATRICKS DAY WITH A PURPOSE$29,175
BROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$6,405
RESET MINISTRIES$6,000
GIBLER TEAM FOUNDATION$2,500
MILFORD JR HIGH SCHOOL$1,766
CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS$1,600
HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION$500
BLUEBIRD BUS OF HOPE$500
CNE CARES$250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 76% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$73k · 11 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$73k

$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%

+77%

Still filing today

36%

37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BC
BROWN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +81%
BA
BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER
2× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +64%
CT
CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS
2× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +1%

Funded once

HF
HOMES FOR HOMESgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +244%
SA
STRAY ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM
one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +7%
R4
REACH 4 THE SKY
one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Loved Twice

The mission of Loved Twice is to clothe newborns in need with quality reused baby clothing for the first year of life. For us, even one baby going without proper clothing is one too many. We believe the community starts with serving our…

Human Services

The Long Way Home Inc

The Long Way Home provides sanctuary and care for animals in crisis or need, as well as an adoption program to find these animals a loving home.

Animals

Habitat for Humanity of Greater

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity of greater cincinnati brings people together to build homes, communities and hope in the tri-state area.

Housing & Shelter

Cancer Family Care Inc

To strengthen the well-being and alleviate the suffering of children, adults and families coping with cancer.

Health

Cincinnati Union Bethel

Empowering women to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and human trafficking.

Human Services

Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

SNAP prevents the suffering and death of companion animals and enriches the human animal bond.

Animals

Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home exists to heal homelessness for women and children who are homeless with nowhere to turn.

Housing & Shelter

Life Connection of Ohio

Secure organ and tissue donors and coordinate transplant services.

Health

Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc

Columbus alliance for battered women provides emergency shelter, security, crisis intervention, and advocacy for adult and child victims of domestic violence.

Human Services

Strategies to End Homelessness Inc

Strategies to End Homelessness leads a community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.

Human Services

Care Net Center of Greater Orleans

Pregnancy counseling

Unclassified

Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons to Computers Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/38

the rest of the field

10%

1,025/9,850

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

31/33

Grantees still filing

27/33

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$135,960Human Services$7,604Health$6,534Animals$5,563Housing & Shelter$5,390Philanthropy$5,038Education$1,280

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH32.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Foundation · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Duke Energy Foundation · Miramar Charitable Foundation · William P Anderson Foundation Central Trust · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Interact for Health

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation AMERICAN HOMELAND TITLE COMMUNITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE KNOCK FAMILY FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 611251738 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE KNOCK FAMILY FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to American Homeland Title Community?

Find your warmest path to American Homeland Title Community through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

AMERICAN HOMELAND TITLE COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to American Homeland Title Community?

More from the funding graph

AMERICAN HOMELAND TITLE COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to American Homeland Title Community?

More from the funding graph