Skip to content

· Public charity

American Friends of Yad Eliezer

To render financial aid and support to the poor and disadvantaged in the usa and israel.

$40M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.3MHuman Services$60kInternational$50k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $345,728, the rows itemized in this filing. The $40,247,796 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,902,068 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$24,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISRAEL MAGEN FUND$92,000
RABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA$88,000
YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON MOSHE$35,000
YESHIVA KEREN ORAH$25,000
CONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH LETORAH$24,500
BINYAN YISROEL INC$23,000
CALIFORNIA EAR INSTITUTE$19,728
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA$19,000
KOLLEL KAMINETZ$10,000
BAYSWATER COMMUNITY MIKVEH ASSOCIATION$9,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANI LEDODI INC: $30k → 20%ISRAEL MAGEN FUND: $92k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS-INTERNATIONAL YOUNG ISRAEL MOVEMENT INC: $50k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $40M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$40M · 100% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: TO HELP THE POOR

North America (Canada and Mexico)$14k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO HELP THE POOR

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 12 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
28

Total granted

$1.7M
$921k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
0%

Still filing today

33%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    RABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $895k
  • UL
    UNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $172k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS TORAS MOSHE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $156k · revenue -14%

Funded once

  • CM
    CONGREGATION MIKDASH DOVID INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • CR
    CONGREGATION RAMAT SCHLOMO
    one grant, 2021 · $145k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $129k · revenue -63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Yikar Mordechai

To facilitate the study of jewish religous thought, practice, philosophy,customs & observance

—
5
American Friends of Yeshiva Tiferet

To solicit, collect and otherwise raise money to support and further the educational work of yeshiva tiferet, a school located in jerusalem, israel, and to generally support, further and advance yeshiva tiferet by all available means and…

Education
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
8
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
9
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
10
American Friends of Mosdot Meir of Israel Inc

To support jewish religious education

Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
12
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends-International Young Israel Movement Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Tzir Hemed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/24
Grantees still filing
10/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $894,750 · OtherRABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICACONGREGATION MIKDASH DOVID INC: $250,000 · OtherCONGREGATION MIKDASH DOVID INCUNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INC: $171,500 · OtherUNITED LUBAVITCHER YESHIVOTH INCCONGREGATION RAMAT SCHLOMO: $145,000 · OtherCONGREGATION RAMAT SCHLOMOFRIENDS OF YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE INC: $129,168 · OtherFRIENDS OF YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE INCRABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $84,000 · OtherYESHIVA KEREN ORAH: $75,600 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH LETORAH INC: $71,035 · Other+14 more: $225,398 · Other+14 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS TORAS MOSHE: $156,036 · InternationalAMERICAN F…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $88,600 · InternationalAMERICAN F…KEREN HATZADIK IN MEMORY OF RABBI ARYEH LEVIN OF BLESSED MEMORY INC: $14,443 · InternationalKEREN HATZ…Israel Magen Fund Inc: $92,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS-INTERNATIONAL YOUNG ISRAEL MOVEMENT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesAni Ledodi Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesCHAZAQ ORGANIZATION USA INC: $52,500 · ReligionTORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU: $24,000 · ReligionYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $20,000 · ReligionZichron Yisroel Yosef Inc: $20,000 · ReligionAISH LIVINGSTON INC: $10,000 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Mercaz Harav Kook: $7,777 · ReligionBinyan Yisroel Inc: $31,000 · EducationMESORAS HATORAH INC: $28,500 · EducationYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $15,000 · EducationYESHIVAT MEKOR CHAIM INC: $9,300 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $7,777 · EducationHEBRON FUND INC: $36,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZIR HEMED: $26,018 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MACHON MEIR INC: $7,777 · PhilanthropyIRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH CULTURAL ORGANIZATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $6,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$2,046,451International$259,079Human Services$172,000Religion$134,277Education$91,577Philanthropy$69,795Arts & Culture$25,000Public Safety & Disaster$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS TORAS MOSHE: $156,036 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE INC: $129,168 over 1y, 15% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $88,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHAZAQ ORGANIZATION USA INC: $52,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS-INTERNATIONAL YOUNG ISRAEL MOVEMENT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBinyan Yisroel Inc: $31,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetAni Ledodi Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetMESORAS HATORAH INC: $28,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZIR HEMED: $26,018 over 1y, 33% of budgetTORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU: $24,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKEREN HATZADIK IN MEMORY OF RABBI ARYEH LEVIN OF BLESSED MEMORY INC: $14,443 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetAISH LIVINGSTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetYESHIVAT MEKOR CHAIM INC: $9,300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MACHON MEIR INC: $7,777 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $7,777 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Mercaz Harav Kook: $7,777 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $5,561 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY32.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Sorala Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Toras Chesed Inc · Maalot · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Federation of Cleveland

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Friends of Yad Eliezer funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Friends of Yad Eliezer. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Mesoras Hatorah Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Friends of Yad Eliezer?

Find your warmest path to American Friends of Yad Eliezer through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Friends of Yad Eliezer’s filings →

More from the funding graph