Skip to content

· Public charity

American Family Foundation Inc

The foundation donates funds to various charitable, religious and educational organizations.

$71k
Granted FY2018
3
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Religion$58kHuman Services$34kHealth$26kInternational$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$6k
02FY2018 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $18,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $71,400 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELPLINE MINISTRIES$6,000
GEORGIA BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME$6,000
GLOBEWORKS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $6k → 8%ONE HOPE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48k · 3 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$48k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+49%

Still filing today

33%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GEORGIA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES AND FAMILY MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k
  • GI
    GLOBEWORKS INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +75%
  • HC
    HELPLINE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k

Funded once

  • LF
    LIVING FREE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue -26%
  • NL
    NO LONGER BOUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +146%
  • WM
    WORLD MISSIONARY EVANGELISM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
2
Global Servants Inc

Christian world-wide missions and ministries to see lives changed by the power and truth of Gods Word.

Religion
3
Gospel Life Global Missions

Sending disciples to glorify god

—
4
Unbound Grace Ministeries

As an arm of the church, we point people bound by addiction to god's unbound grace through counseling, discipleship and community.

Health
5
Freed Life

Freed Life exists to eradicate human trafficking through empowering survivors, equipping communities and changing systems.

—
6
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
7
Missions International

Provide assistance to persons in foreign countries

International
8
Global Mobilization Ministries Inc

To support christian ministries throughout the world

Religion
9
Global Outreach Inc

To share Christian compassion and love in an effort to alleviate spiritual, physical, emotional and mental suffering around the world. We help care for orphans and vulnerable children, teens and women in need. We provide training and…

International
10
Mission Without Borders Incorporated

Mission Without Borders (MWB) is dedicated to reaching people for Christ through an international network of Christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,…

International
11
Global Frontier Missions Inc

Mobilizing, training, and multiplying disciples and churches to meet the physical and spiritual needs of the unreached people groups of the earth.

Religion
12
Shepherds Staff Mission Fac Inc

World missions

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is No Longer Bound Inc; the most unlike its peers is Temporary Emergency Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGIA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES AND FAMILY MINISTRIES INC: $18,000 · OtherGEORGIA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOMES AND FAMILY MIN…HELPLINE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $12,000 · OtherHELPLINE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH MINISTRIES INCWORLD MISSIONARY EVANGELISM INC: $9,600 · OtherWORLD MISSIONARY EVANGELISM INCTEMPORARY EMERGENCY SERVICES: $6,000 · OtherTEMPORARY EMERGENCY SERVICESBARLEY LOAF MINISTRIES: $6,000 · OtherBARLEY LOAF MINISTRIESHOUSEHOLD OF FAITH DELIVERANCE CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherHOUSEHOLD OF FAITH DELIVERANCE CHURCHLIVING FREE INC: $16,800 · HealthLIVING FREE INCNO LONGER BOUND INC: $9,600 · HealthNO LONGER BOUND INCGLOBEWORKS INTERNATIONAL INC: $18,000 · ReligionGLOBEWORKS INTERNAT…BLOUNT COUNTY SAV-A-LIFE: $6,000 · ReligionBLOUNT COUNTY SAV-A…One Hope United: $9,600 · Human ServicesOne Hope Uni…CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $6,000 · Human ServicesCALVARY CHIL…Mercy Ships Foundation: $9,600 · PhilanthropyFULL GOSPEL NATIVE MISSIONARY: $6,000 · International
Other$57,600Health$26,400Religion$24,000Human Services$15,600Philanthropy$9,600International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNO LONGER BOUND INC: $9,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Ships Foundation: $9,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne Hope United: $9,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEMPORARY EMERGENCY SERVICES: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFULL GOSPEL NATIVE MISSIONARY: $6,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBLOUNT COUNTY SAV-A-LIFE: $6,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to American Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph