Skip to content
American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

None

$385k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MEducation$50kPublic Benefit$39k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $107,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $384,844 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $277,344 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER$25,000
JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION$20,000
MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER$15,000
OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC$10,000
SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$7,500
DESERT VIEW HOSPITAL$7,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$7,000
WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Tuscon Medical Center: $30k → 15%BREAST CENTER OF IRVINE: $10k → 10%NY PROJECT RENEWAL INC SCANVAN: $10k → 17%Breast Cancer Resource Center: $20k → 10%Spring Branch Community Health Center: $10k → 16%OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $10k → 15%State of South Carolina: $20k → 16%Moffitt Cancer Center Foundation: $25k → 13%JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%LANE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION (REX HEALTHCARE): $15k → 8%Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institue: $10k → 10%Dekalb Medical Center Foundation: $10k → 14%EAST GEORGIA ANCER COALITION: $10k → 27%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%TRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEPT OF HEALTH'S ALL WOMEN COUNT: $10k → 10%Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center: $15k → 19%Mercy Medical Center: $10k → 19%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%Tuscon Medical Center: $15k → 15%Breast Center of Irvine: $10k → 10%NY PROJECT RENEWAL INC SCANVAN: $10k → 17%South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control: $10k → 16%DC Howard University: $25k → 14%MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%LANE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institue: $10k → 10%Dekalb Medical Center Foundation: $10k → 14%TRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $15k → 19%DC Howard University: $25k → 14%MOFFITT CANCER CENTER: $25k → 13%JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION (REX HEALTHCARE): $15k → 8%Tri-Cities Cancer Center Foundation: $15k → 11%MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $15k → 19%Moffitt Cancer Center Foundation: $20k → 13%JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%Tri-Cities Cancer Center Foundation: $15k → 11%MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $15k → 19%Moffitt Cancer Center Foundation: $20k → 13%Joy to Life Foundation: $15k → 18%Tri-Cities Cancer Center Foundation: $15k → 11%Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center: $15k → 19%MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $15k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MI
NY
SD
OH
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 26 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+21%

Still filing today

77%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +102%
  • JT
    JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $115k · revenue +18%
  • TM
    Tucson Medical Center
    3× · 2019–2021 · $55k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • BC
    BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +30%
  • SO
    STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEPT OF HEALTH'S ALL WOMEN COUNT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TH
    TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
2
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
3
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
5
Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

Health
6
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
10
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Joseph Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Maine Coast Regional Health Facilities Northern Light Maine Coast Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INCJOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $115,000 · HealthJOY TO LIFE FOUNDATIONTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $85,000 · HealthTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $60,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INCTucson Medical Center: $55,000 · HealthTucson Medical CenterMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $45,000 · HealthMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $45,000 · HealthMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTERBREAST CENTER OF IRVINE INC: $40,000 · HealthPROJECT RENEWAL INC: $30,000 · Health+15 more: $173,500 · Health+15 moreTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · OtherTHE REX HEALTHCARE F…SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $39,400 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE U…SOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK: $29,700 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA NETWO…LANE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherLANE COUNTY HOSPITALLANE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherLANE COUNTY HOSPITALSTATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEPT OF HEALTH'S ALL WOMEN COUNT: $10,000 · OtherAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institue: $10,000 · OtherMississippi State Department of Health: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $7,000 · OtherTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERS…EAST GEORGIA CANCER COALITION: $45,000 · EducationEAST GEORGIA CANCE…TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDAT…ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationST JOSEPH HOSPITAL…DEKALB MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · EducationDEKALB MEDICAL CEN…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIV…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $7,000 · Education
Health$813,500Other$221,100Education$202,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTucson Medical Center: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetEAST GEORGIA CANCER COALITION: $45,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CENTER OF IRVINE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetPROJECT RENEWAL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMercy Medical Center: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBAYHEALTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Coast Regional Health Facilities Northern Light Maine Coast Hospital: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…American Gift FundMorgan Stanley Global…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…Raymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…
American Cancer Society IncGA16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · American Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Bayhealth Foundation Corporation: 4% of income from government
  • Mercy Medical Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Breast Cancer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home