Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

None

$385k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$814kEducation$202kOther$221k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $107,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $384,844 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $277,344 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER$25,000
JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION$20,000
MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER$15,000
OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC$10,000
SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$7,500
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$7,000
DESERT VIEW HOSPITAL$7,000
WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Tuscon Medical Center: $30k → 15%BREAST CENTER OF IRVINE: $10k → 10%NY PROJECT RENEWAL INC SCANVAN: $10k → 17%Breast Cancer Resource Center: $20k → 10%Spring Branch Community Health Center: $10k → 16%OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $10k → 15%State of South Carolina: $20k → 16%MOFFITT CANCER CENTER: $25k → 13%JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%LANE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institue: $10k → 10%Dekalb Medical Center Foundation: $10k → 14%EAST GEORGIA CANCER COALITION INC: $10k → 27%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%TRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%SD DEPT OF HEALTH ALL WOMEN: $10k → 10%MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $15k → 19%Mercy Medical Center: $10k → 19%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%Tuscon Medical Center: $15k → 15%BREAST CENTER OF IRVINE: $10k → 10%NY PROJECT RENEWAL INC SCANVAN: $10k → 17%South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control: $10k → 16%DC Howard University: $25k → 14%Moffitt Cancer Center Foundation: $25k → 13%JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%LANE COUNTY HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION (REX HEALTHCARE): $15k → 8%Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institue: $10k → 10%Dekalb Medical Center Foundation: $10k → 14%TRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center: $15k → 19%DC Howard University: $25k → 14%MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION (REX HEALTHCARE): $15k → 8%Tri-Cities Cancer Center Foundation: $15k → 11%MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $15k → 19%Moffitt Cancer Center Foundation: $20k → 13%JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%Tri-Cities Cancer Center Foundation: $15k → 11%Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center: $15k → 19%Moffitt Cancer Center Foundation: $20k → 13%Joy to Life Foundation: $15k → 18%Tri-Cities Cancer Center Foundation: $15k → 11%MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $15k → 19%MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $15k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MI
NY
SD
OH
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 26 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+17%

Still filing today

77%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’25
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +102%
  • JT
    JOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $115k · revenue +18%
  • TM
    Tucson Medical Center
    3× · 2019–2021 · $55k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • BC
    BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +17%
  • SO
    STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEPT OF HEALTH'S ALL WOMEN COUNT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TH
    TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
2
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
3
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

Health
5
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
10
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
11
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Joseph Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Maine Coast Regional Health Facilities Northern Light Maine Coast Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%51%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%28%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,528

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INCJOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION — $115,000 · HealthJOY TO LIFE FOUNDATIONTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $85,000 · HealthTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC — $60,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INCTucson Medical Center — $55,000 · HealthTucson Medical CenterMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $45,000 · HealthMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER — $45,000 · HealthMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTERBREAST CENTER OF IRVINE INC — $40,000 · HealthPROJECT RENEWAL INC — $30,000 · Health+15 more — $173,500 · Health+15 moreTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · OtherTHE REX HEALTHCARE F…SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY — $39,400 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE U…SOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK — $29,700 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA NETWO…LANE COUNTY HOSPITAL — $20,000 · OtherLANE COUNTY HOSPITALLANE COUNTY HOSPITAL — $20,000 · OtherLANE COUNTY HOSPITALSTATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEPT OF HEALTH'S ALL WOMEN COUNT — $10,000 · OtherMississippi State Department of Health — $10,000 · OtherAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institue — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $7,000 · OtherTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERS…TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDAT…EAST GEORGIA CANCER COALITION — $45,000 · EducationEAST GEORGIA CANCE…DEKALB MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 · EducationDEKALB MEDICAL CEN…ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationST JOSEPH HOSPITAL…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIV…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $7,000 · Education
Health$813,500Other$221,100Education$202,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION — $115,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTucson Medical Center — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEAST GEORGIA CANCER COALITION — $45,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBREAST CENTER OF IRVINE INC — $40,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetPROJECT RENEWAL INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMercy Medical Center — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAYHEALTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Coast Regional Health Facilities Northern Light Maine Coast Hospital — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…American Gift FundMorgan Stanley Global…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…Raymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…
American Cancer Society IncGA16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · American Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Bayhealth Foundation Corporation — 4% of income from government
  • Mercy Medical Center — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to American Breast Cancer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines