Skip to content
America Gives Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

America Gives Inc

The organization's mission is to serve as an information resource about charities in the state of israel, the united states and around the world.

$23M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$193k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$326kEducation$99kHealth$76kReligion$44kRecreation & Sports$24kPhilanthropy$20kFood & Nutrition$13kHuman Services$11k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $494,082, the rows itemized in this filing. The $23,140,356 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,646,274 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $466k
$75,580
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLDWIDE FRIENDS FOUNDATION$193,050
WORLD CONFEDERATION OF UNITED ZIONISTS INC$118,752
ARI FULD PROJECT$78,845
SHIR FOR LIFE$75,580
ASIEL FOUNDATION$14,500
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$7,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC$4,855
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC: $5k → 14%GREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
DE
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $23M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$23M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHARITY AND EDUCATION GRANTS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
5
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
8
American Friends of Ohel Bas Zion Inc
—
9
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Jewish Life Foundation
—
11
Israel Initiative 2020 Inc
International
12
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Be a Mensch Foundati On Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shir for Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Worldwide Friends Foundation: $193,050 · InternationalWorldwide Friends FoundationWorld Confederation of United Zionists: $118,752 · InternationalWorld Confederation of United ZionistsFRIENDS OF OFANIM INC: $10,925 · InternationalTHE ARI FULD PROJECT: $78,845 · EducationTHE ARI FULD P…+1 more: $300 · EducationSHIR FOR LIFE INC: $75,580 · HealthSHIR FOR LIFE…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $12,723 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $7,000 · PhilanthropyHIDABROOT CORP: $5,036 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $1,500 · PhilanthropyASIEL FOUNDATION INC: $14,500 · OtherEZRAT ISRAEL INC: $12,480 · OtherKOL ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $10,900 · OtherCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC: $24,200 · Recreation & SportsERETZ ISRAEL MOVEMENT: $20,588 · ReligionGREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC: $5,828 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC: $4,855 · Human Services
International$322,727Education$79,145Health$75,580Philanthropy$41,259Other$37,880Recreation & Sports$24,200Religion$20,588Human Services$10,683

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorldwide Friends Foundation: $193,050 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ARI FULD PROJECT: $78,845 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetSHIR FOR LIFE INC: $75,580 over 1y, 38% of budgetCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC: $24,200 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetERETZ ISRAEL MOVEMENT: $20,588 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $12,723 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF OFANIM INC: $10,925 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKOL ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $10,900 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIDABROOT CORP: $5,036 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC: $4,855 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Phila…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization America Gives Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from America Gives Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on America Gives’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home