Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

America Gives Inc

The organization's mission is to serve as an information resource about charities in the state of israel, the united states and around the world.

$23M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$193k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$326kEducation$99kHealth$76kReligion$44kRecreation & Sports$24kPhilanthropy$20kFood & Nutrition$13kHuman Services$11k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $494,082 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $23,140,356 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $22,646,274 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $466k
$75,580
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLDWIDE FRIENDS FOUNDATION$193,050
WORLD CONFEDERATION OF UNITED ZIONISTS INC$118,752
ARI FULD PROJECT$78,845
SHIR FOR LIFE$75,580
ASIEL FOUNDATION$14,500
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$7,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC$4,855
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC: $5k → 14%GREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
DE
DC

Grants abroad, by region — $23M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$23M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHARITY AND EDUCATION GRANTS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
2
University of Judaism Foundation
3
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
7
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Ohel Bas Zion Inc
9
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Jewish Life Foundation
11
Israel Initiative 2020 Inc
International
12
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Be a Mensch Foundati On Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shir for Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Worldwide Friends Foundation — $193,050 · InternationalWorldwide Friends FoundationWorld Confederation of United Zionists — $118,752 · InternationalWorld Confederation of United ZionistsFRIENDS OF OFANIM INC — $10,925 · InternationalTHE ARI FULD PROJECT — $78,845 · EducationTHE ARI FULD P…+1 more — $300 · EducationSHIR FOR LIFE INC — $75,580 · HealthSHIR FOR LIFE…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $12,723 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $7,000 · PhilanthropyHIDABROOT CORP — $5,036 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $1,500 · PhilanthropyASIEL FOUNDATION INC — $14,500 · OtherEZRAT ISRAEL INC — $12,480 · OtherKOL ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $10,900 · OtherCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC — $24,200 · Recreation & SportsERETZ ISRAEL MOVEMENT — $20,588 · ReligionGREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INC — $5,828 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC — $4,855 · Human Services
International$322,727Education$79,145Health$75,580Philanthropy$41,259Other$37,880Recreation & Sports$24,200Religion$20,588Human Services$10,683

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWorldwide Friends Foundation — $193,050 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ARI FULD PROJECT — $78,845 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetSHIR FOR LIFE INC — $75,580 over 1y, 38% of budgetCAMP MOSHAVA OF WILD ROSE INC — $24,200 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetERETZ ISRAEL MOVEMENT — $20,588 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $12,723 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF OFANIM INC — $10,925 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKOL ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $10,900 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIDABROOT CORP — $5,036 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC — $4,855 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization America Gives Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph