· Private foundation
AM Josephs Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION CHEVRA KADISHA | $50,000 |
| JEW IN THE CITY | $10,000 |
| YOUNG ISRAEL OF BOCA RATON | $8,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHE NOAM INC | $6,000 |
| YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH OF BOCA RATON INC | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC | $3,600 |
| TORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA RATON INC | $2,500 |
| BOCA RATON KOLLEL | $1,000 |
| KEREN HATZADIK - IN MEMORY OF RABBIARYEH LEVIN OF | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC | $500 |
| COMMITTEE FOR THE RESCUE OF ISRAELS BABIES | $500 |
| CHASDEI AVOS | $500 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JIJew in the City A NJ Nonprofit Corporation9× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +155%
- AFAmerican Friends of Darche Noam Inc - David Shapell College of Jewish Studies9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +9%
- JEJEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA6× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF IR DAVID INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
- BYBAIS YAAKOV OF BOCA RATON INCone grant, 2024 · $3k
- MMASBIAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
Support of religious schools in Israel
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
To further jewish education in israel
Relief of poverty by means of grants to social service agencies and to individual families in israel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Leket Israel Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jew in the City A NJ Nonprofit Corporation ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Darche Noam Inc - David Shapell College of Jewish Studies ↗
- Who funds JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds TORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA RATON INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
- Who funds AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds Committee for the Rescue of Israel Babies DBA Efrat ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC ↗
- Who funds YAD L'ACHIM PEYLEI ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS BIRCAS HATORAH INC ↗
- Who funds CHASDEI AVOS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds MASBIA ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEV ECHAD INC ↗
- Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds KEREN HATZADIK IN MEMORY OF RABBI ARYEH LEVIN OF BLESSED MEMORY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEMA'AN ACHAI ↗
- Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds Ohr Hatorah ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JACOBS LADDER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDATH BEIT AVRAHAM CO JOSEPH SCHWARTZ CPA ↗
- Who funds YISMACH MOSHE INC ↗
- Who funds RABBI WITHOUT WALLS ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds MATANAH BSESSER OF SOUTH FLORIDA I ↗
- Who funds BEYNEYNU- THE COMMITTEE FOR GOOD RELATIONSINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Terumah Foundation Inc · The Slomo and Cindy Silvian Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Ari & Cheryl Pearl Foundation Inc · The Irving I Moskowitz Foundation · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization AM Josephs Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Torah Academy of Boca Raton Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.