Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Alzheimers Disease Data Initiative Inc

Alzheimer's Disease Data Initiative is a coalition of leading academic, advocacy, government, industry, and philanthropy organizations that recognizes the need for dementia researchers to find easier ways to share data, analytical tools, and scientific findings.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Health$4.0MScience & Tech$745kEducation$150k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $1,095,289 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,014,488 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,919,199 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$125,289
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative (DAC)$225,000
Georgia State University Research Foundation (GSU)$200,000
Sage Bionetworks$195,000
Answer ALS$150,000
American Heart Association (AHA)$125,289
Alleo Labs Corporation$50,000
Washington University in St Louis$50,000
University of California San Francisco (UCSF)$50,000
State of Maryland University of Maryland Baltimore$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Banner Health: $296k → 11%Critical Path Institute: $1.8M → 15%Vivli Inc: $55k → 8%Boston University: $366k → 16%Alleo Labs Corporation: $50k → 10%Davos Alzheimers Collaborative Inc: $560k → 14%Washington University in St Louis: $50k → 11%University of Washington Foundation: $91k → 9%Answer ALS: $150k → 15%State of Maryland University of Maryland Baltimore: $50k → 19%BANNER ALZHEIMERs INSTITUTE: $296k → 11%Alleo Labs Corporation: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MA
CA
MO
MD
AZ
DC
LA

Grants abroad, by region — $1.9M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.8M · 95% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: Platform interoperability, data sharing, data harmonization · Data sharing, coordination with sites making data sharable · International data sharing and analysis pilot projects

South Asia$50k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Gates Sr. AD Fellowship recipient award

East Asia and the Pacific$50k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Gates Sr. AD Fellowship recipient award

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of Alzheimers Disease Data Initiative Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Alzheimers Disease Data Initiative Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
3
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
4
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
11
Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research

Pavir's mission is advancing veterans and public health through innovative research. pavir works with more than 100 principal investigators and 200 research staff to support basic science, clinical and health services research to realize…

Health
12
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University and the most unlike its peers is Banner Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE — $1,833,822 · HealthCRITICAL PATH INSTITUTEBanner Health — $591,000 · HealthBanner HealthDAVOS ALZHEIMER'S COLLABORATIVE INC — $560,000 · HealthDAVOS ALZHEIMER'S COLLABORATIVE INCANSWER ALS — $150,000 · Health+1 more — $54,750 · HealthTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $365,766 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYDavos Alzheimer's Collaborative (DAC) — $225,000 · OtherDavos Alzheimer's Collaborative (DAC…Georgia State University Research Foundation (GSU) — $200,000 · OtherGeorgia State University Research Fo…Sage Bionetworks — $195,000 · OtherSage BionetworksAnswer ALS — $150,000 · OtherAnswer ALSAmerican Heart Association (AHA) — $125,289 · OtherAmerican Heart Association (AHA)+6 more — $300,000 · Other+6 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $91,253 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · Education
Health$3,189,572Other$1,561,055Education$141,253

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE — $1,833,822 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetBanner Health — $591,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVOS ALZHEIMER'S COLLABORATIVE INC — $560,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $365,766 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANSWER ALS — $150,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $91,253 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVIVLI INC — $54,750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Banner Health
  • Who funds DAVOS ALZHEIMER'S COLLABORATIVE INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ANSWER ALS
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VIVLI INC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alzheimers Disease Data Initiative Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alzheimers Disease Data Initiative Inc?

Find your warmest path to Alzheimers Disease Data Initiative Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph