Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alvah and Doris Veit Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$415kInternational$144kEducation$43kRecreation & Sports$34kCommunity Improvement$30kEmployment$10kYouth Development$8kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$728k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
People Int'l$8,000
New Covenant Missions$5,000
New Horizons Foundation$5,000
Worldlink$5,000
Central Missionary Clearinghouse$5,000
Every Village$2,500
Young Life Camden County$2,500
Awakening Lives to World Missions$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Tabitha's Heart: $5k → 7%International Care Inc: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$505k · 21 repeat orgs$328k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
35

Total granted

$505k
$310k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+21%

Still filing today

38%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    Gospel Outbound
    5× · 2017–2021 · $57k · revenue +462%
  • CM
    Central Missionary Clearinghouse Inc
    3× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +63%
  • TM
    THE MAILBOX CLUB INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • FC
    Faith Calvary India Trip and R&D
    one grant, 2017 · $41k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $26k
  • RA
    Reaching and Teaching Int'l - Trucks and Deedrick
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
2
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
3
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
4
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
5
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
6
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
7
International Church Missions

Proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ evangelism discipleship and church planting

International
8
International Messengers

International Messengers is an evangelical, interdenominational missions organization comprised of international staff. We are committed to making disciples of all nations through partnering with local churches to renew, train and mobilize…

Religion
9
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
10
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
11
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
12
Equip Ministries International

Equip ministries trains overseas pastors and leaders, empowers the church, provides humanitarian aid, and attempts to reach the unreached peoples around the world by working with church leaders to fulfil

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is ECatalyst. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WorldLink: $95,400 · OtherWorldLinkAGORA (General and Lane): $43,000 · OtherAGORA (General and Lane)IBEC: $42,000 · OtherIBECFaith Calvary India Trip and R&D: $40,765 · OtherFaith Calvary India Trip and R&DIndividual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $26,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,920 · OtherFrontline Missions: $22,500 · OtherCentral Missionary Clearinghouse Inc: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+28 more: $226,243 · Other+28 moreGospel Outbound: $56,700 · ReligionGospel OutboundTHE UPSTREAM COLLECTIVE: $11,000 · ReligionTHE UPSTREAM COLL…WORLDLINK INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $10,400 · ReligionWORLDLINK INTERNA…THE POCKET TESTAMENT LEAGUE INC: $10,000 · ReligionTHE POCKET TESTAM…TO EVERY TRIBE: $10,000 · ReligionTO EVERY TRIBEEpic International Corporation: $10,000 · ReligionEpic Internationa…East-West Ministries International: $8,850 · ReligionEast-West Ministr…ETERNAL IMPACT MISSIONS INC: $5,000 · Religion+2 more: $4,500 · ReligionENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $25,000 · InternationalENGLISH LA…INTERNATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES: $10,000 · InternationalINTERNATIO…FREEDOM BUSINESS ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · InternationalFREEDOM BU…NEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC: $10,000 · InternationalNEW COVENA…PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 · InternationalPEOPLE INT…SERVANT PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · InternationalSERVANT PR…AFRICANS REACHING AFRICA INC: $5,000 · InternationalAFRICANS R…+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentECatalyst: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTABITHAS HEART: $5,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL CARE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$599,828Religion$126,450International$75,500Youth Development$13,000Community Improvement$10,000Human Services$8,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGospel Outbound: $56,700 over 5y, 13% of budgetENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Missionary Clearinghouse Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAILBOX CLUB INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UPSTREAM COLLECTIVE: $11,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetWORLDLINK INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $10,400 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE POCKET TESTAMENT LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTO EVERY TRIBE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEpic International Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFREEDOM BUSINESS ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetNEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCUP OF COLD WATER MINISTRIES: $7,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVANT PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAFRICANS REACHING AFRICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTABITHAS HEART: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CARE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAWAKENING LIVES TO WORLD MISSIONS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEVERY VILLAGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARNABAS INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Gospel Outbound ↗
  • Who funds ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA ↗
  • Who funds Central Missionary Clearinghouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MAILBOX CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UPSTREAM COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds WORLDLINK INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE POCKET TESTAMENT LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TO EVERY TRIBE ↗
  • Who funds ECatalyst ↗
  • Who funds Epic International Corporation ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM BUSINESS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CUP OF COLD WATER MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bolick FoundationNC23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bolick Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Finishing Fund Management · Stoller Foundation · Gordon Christian Trust · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Eden Bridge Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alvah and Doris Veit Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alvah and Doris Veit Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alvah and Doris Veit Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Alvah and Doris Veit Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alvah and Doris Veit’s filings →

More from the funding graph