Skip to content
Alumbra Innovations Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Alumbra Innovations Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28M
Granted FY2024still arriving
137
Grants FY2024still arriving
24
States reached
$5.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$22MInternational$17MArts & Culture$15MEducation$7.9MFood & Nutrition$6.6MPhilanthropy$5.7MRecreation & Sports$4.8MHuman Services$2.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 137 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $782k
  • $50k–250k64 grants · $7.1M
  • $250k+22 grants · $21M
$69,787
Median grant
24
States reached
$113M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
International Community Foundation$5,508,501
San Diego Natural History Museum$4,000,000
University of Minnesota Foundation$1,150,914
Andale La Paz AC$1,118,079
International Community Foundation$1,106,395
International Generosity Foundation Trust$961,275
Ecology Project International$729,500
Hopewell Fund$700,000
The San Diego Foundation$625,000
US Water Partnership$528,152
Blue Forest Finance Inc$500,000
Justice Outside$500,000
Sociedad de Historia Natural Niparaja$402,920
Sustainable Northwest$399,838
International Community Foundation$375,395
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($77M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($12M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Los Cabos Children's Foundation: $180k → 6%TeamBrownsville Inc: $50k → 23%Los Cabos Children's Foundation: $136k → 6%Hawkeye Area Community Action Program Inc: $5k → 9%Voices Jackson Hole: $100k → 5%Voices Jackson Hole: $100k → 5%Voices Jackson Hole: $50k → 5%American National Red Cross: $250k → 14%World Food Program USA: $250k → 14%American National Red Cross: $25k → 14%ICF Center for Cross-Border Philanthropy aka Olivewood Gardens and Learning: $1.3M → 11%Olivewood Gardens and Learning Center: $237k → 11%ICF Center for Cross-Border Philanthropy: $200k → 11%Olivewood Gardens and Learning Center: $2k → 11%Serving Seniors: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
WY
SD
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
DE
AZ
AR
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($12M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Mexico$12M · 79 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Alumbra Innovations Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Alumbra Innovations Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 33% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60M · 78 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 59 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
58

Total granted

$60M
$8.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+4%

Still filing today

73%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $12M · revenue +62% · 25% of their budget
  • SN
    SUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +121% · 45% of their budget
  • BF
    BLUE FOREST FINANCE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +67% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • DR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue +66%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NW ARKANSAS
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -57%
  • LC
    Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
    one grant, 2020 · $405k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
4
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
5
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
8
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
11
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
12
Conservation X Labs Inc

To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is New Heights Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 182 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

18
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
137/138
Grantees still filing
79/138
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,648,404 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY…HOPEWELL FUND: $2,100,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUNDTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,405,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIO…JUSTICE OUTSIDE: $630,000 · Philanthropy+10 more: $2,090,925 · Philanthropy+10 moreAndale La Paz AC: $3,782,017 · OtherAndale La Paz ACUS WATER PARTNERSHIP: $1,957,627 · OtherUS WATER PARTNERSHIPAlumbra La Paz AC: $1,433,277 · OtherSociedad de Historia Natural Niparaja: $1,133,773 · OtherSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST: $3,824,838 · OtherSUSTAINABLE NORTHWESTOLIVEWOODS GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,744,835 · OtherOLIVEWOODS GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER I…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $1,250,000 · Other+93 more: $15,477,830 · Other+93 moreSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $12,291,662 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO SOCIET…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NW ARKANSAS: $500,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $295,000 · Arts & CultureBLUE FOREST FINANCE INC: $3,500,000 · EnvironmentBLUE FOREST F…Clean Future Forum Inc: $1,581,252 · EnvironmentClean Future …RESILIENT CITIES CATALYST INC: $1,383,758 · EnvironmentRESILIENT CIT…ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $1,248,363 · EnvironmentECOLOGY PROJE…TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC: $647,335 · EnvironmentTETON SCIENCE…MULTIPLIER: $400,000 · Environment+19 more: $1,689,193 · Environment+19 moreUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $2,537,456 · EducationDR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC: $1,500,000 · EducationSCHOOL CHOICE WISCONSIN INC: $600,000 · EducationOCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $432,100 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $350,000 · EducationJackson Hole Community School: $320,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $300,000 · EducationWAVE ACADEMY: $230,000 · Education+5 more: $309,917 · EducationRUSTED GATE FARM: $4,063,922 · Food & NutritionMAD AGRICULTURE: $250,000 · Food & NutritionHole Food Rescue: $250,000 · Food & Nutrition+5 more: $272,100 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $1,238,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,070,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $470,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE OF THE AMERICAS: $461,160 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $300,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300,000 · InternationalFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $160,000 · International+8 more: $738,596 · International
Philanthropy$18,874,329Other$30,604,197Arts & Culture$13,086,662Environment$10,449,901Education$6,579,473Food & Nutrition$4,836,022International$4,738,256

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,648,404 over 3y, 31% of budgetSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $12,291,662 over 5y, 25% of budgetRUSTED GATE FARM: $4,063,922 over 3y, 21% of budgetSUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST: $3,824,838 over 5y, 45% of budgetBLUE FOREST FINANCE INC: $3,500,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $2,537,456 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $2,100,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUS WATER PARTNERSHIP: $1,957,627 over 4y, 100% of budgetOLIVEWOODS GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,744,835 over 3y, 54% of budgetClean Future Forum Inc: $1,581,252 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetDR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC: $1,500,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,405,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRESILIENT CITIES CATALYST INC: $1,383,758 over 5y, 12% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $1,250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $1,248,363 over 3y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $1,238,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,070,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST: $961,275 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC: $647,335 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetJUSTICE OUTSIDE: $630,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSCHOOL CHOICE WISCONSIN INC: $600,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NW ARKANSAS: $500,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $470,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE OF THE AMERICAS: $461,160 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetOCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $432,100 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $405,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $400,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ALMANOR FOUNDATION: $375,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetStronger America Through Seafood Inc: $364,120 over 5y, 25% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJackson Hole Community School: $320,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetLos Cabos Children's Foundation: $316,483 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $306,325 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $300,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeridian Institute: $295,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST: $295,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $280,255 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $275,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELEMENTARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $267,100 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetNew Heights Christian School: $265,000 over 5y, 44% of budgetSAN DIEGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $255,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetMAD AGRICULTURE: $250,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHeartland Forward Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetVoices Jackson Hole: $250,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetHole Food Rescue: $250,000 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds RUSTED GATE FARM ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds BLUE FOREST FINANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds US WATER PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds OLIVEWOODS GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Clean Future Forum Inc ↗
  • Who funds DR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RESILIENT CITIES CATALYST INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE OUTSIDE ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL CHOICE WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NW ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF THE AMERICAS ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLIER ↗
  • Who funds THE ALMANOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Stronger America Through Seafood Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Builders Vision Found…The Conrad Prebys Fou…The San Diego Foundat…Walton Family Foundat…Jewish Community Foun…Price Philanthropies …Community Foundation …Gordon E and Betty I …The Parker FoundationThe David and Lucile …Silicon Valley Commun…Rancho Santa Fe Found…
Builders Vision FoundationIL36.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Builders Vision Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The Parker Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alumbra Innovations Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alumbra Innovations Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Rusted Gate Farm: 100% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Coquille Watershed Association: 21% of income from government
  • Forth Mobility Fund: 7% of income from government
  • Sustainable Northwest: 5% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alumbra Innovations Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Alumbra Innovations Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 182 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alumbra Innovations’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home