· Private foundation
Alter Isaac & Charlotte Gross Irrevocable Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $20,800 |
| CHEVRA TZEDEKAH V'CHESED | $18,000 |
| YESHIVAS CHASAM SOFER | $10,000 |
| CHASDEI LEV | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI | $10,000 |
| HACHNOSAS KALLAH | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC | $3,600 |
| FRIENDS OF BET ELAZRAKIQ | $1,800 |
| CONGREGATION AHAVAS CHESED | $1,200 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $750 |
| BELEV ECHAD | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $360 |
| Individual grant recipient | $180 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CTCHEVRA TZEDOKA V CHESED9× · 2017–2025 · $164k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2023–2025 · $57k
- HKHACHNOSAS KALLAH9× · 2017–2025 · $52k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $23k
- CGCONGREGATION GATES OF MERCYone grant, 2023 · $18k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF KIRYAT ARBA INCone grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue -36%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
To further jewish education in israel
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
Relief of poverty by means of grants to social service agencies and to individual families in israel.
To support the charitable activities of the organization ezrat achim in the city of beit shemesh, israel.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF KIRYAT ARBA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI ↗
- Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
- Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
- Who funds ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Jemys Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Alter Isaac & Charlotte Gross Irrevocable Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alter Isaac & Charlotte Gross Irrevocable Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alter Isaac & Charlotte Gross Irrevocable Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Alter Isaac & Charlotte Gross Irrevocable Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Alter Isaac & Charlotte Gross Irrevocable’s filings →