Skip to content

· Private foundation

Altalib Family Foundation - Aff

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.3MEducation$286kCivil Rights$196kArts & Culture$175kInternational$153kHealth$125kReligion$62kYouth Development$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$164k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$21,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
DR AHMED NABIL ELREFAI$9,000
Individual grant recipient$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,900
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,200
FAITH$700
ELTAYEB CARE INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EXPRESS CARE INC: $38k → 6%EXPRESS CARE INC: $31k → 6%FOUNDATION FOR APPROPRIATE & IMMEDIATE TEMPORARY HELP (FAITH): $10k → 6%FAITH: $700 → 6%EXPRESS CARE INC: $500 → 6%EXPRESS CARE INC: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$781k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
31

Total granted

$1.6M
$713k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+106%

Still filing today

58%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CAIR-FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $195k · revenue +41%
  • AC
    ADAMS Compassionate Healthcare Network
    2× · 2017–2018 · $66k · revenue +442% · 26% of their budget
  • ME
    MUSLIM EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $50k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +143%
  • NI
    NASHVILLE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +113%
  • IM
    ISLAMIC MONTESSORI ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $62k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
4
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
5
Cambodian Islamic Foundation
Education
6
Muslim Response Usa for Relief and Development

To provide material and financial assistance to relieve the sufferings of any and all persons affected by disasters. conflicts, disease. and hunger, irrespective of race. creed or ethnicity. To support schools and other learning centers…

International
7
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
8
Tvislaamaa

To spread islamic values to the globe through media

Arts & Culture
9
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
10
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
11
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
12
Zahra Foundation Ltd

Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary; the most unlike its peers is Express Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IKRAM FOUNDATION: $1,079,415 · OtherIKRAM FOUNDATIONISLAMIC MONTESSORI ACADEMY: $61,900 · OtherADAMS OPERATIONS: $60,000 · Other+36 more: $439,946 · Other+36 moreCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $195,000 · Civil RightsCAIR-FOUN…+1 more: $1,000 · Civil RightsNASHVILLE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY: $75,000 · EducationMUSLIM EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCIL INC: $50,000 · EducationCHARLOTTE ISLAMIC ACADEMY INC: $25,000 · EducationMOSUL RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · InternationalSYRIAN COMMUNITY NETWORK: $50,000 · InternationalPEARL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $15,000 · International+2 more: $4,700 · InternationalTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureEXPRESS CARE INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesFoundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary: $10,700 · Human ServicesADAMS Compassionate Healthcare Network: $66,000 · Health
Other$1,641,261Civil Rights$196,000Education$150,000International$144,700Arts & Culture$100,000Human Services$80,700Health$66,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $195,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNASHVILLE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY: $75,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetEXPRESS CARE INC: $70,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetADAMS Compassionate Healthcare Network: $66,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetMOSUL RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetMUSLIM EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCIL INC: $50,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSYRIAN COMMUNITY NETWORK: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPEARL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary: $10,700 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUS Council of Muslim Organizations: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAfrica Relief and Community Development: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds EXPRESS CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADAMS Compassionate Healthcare Network ↗
  • Who funds MOSUL RECOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM EDUCATION RESOURCE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRIAN COMMUNITY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE ISLAMIC ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEARL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary ↗
  • Who funds US Council of Muslim Organizations ↗
  • Who funds United Mission For Relief & Development ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sterling Charitable Gift FundVA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sterling Charitable Gift Fund · The Mirza Family Foundation · Barzinji Family Foundation · Islamic Relief USA · M Omar Ashraf Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Altalib Family Foundation - Aff funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Altalib Family Foundation - Aff. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Altalib Family Foundation - Aff?

Find your warmest path to Altalib Family Foundation - Aff through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Altalib Family Foundation - Aff’s filings →

More from the funding graph