Loading…
· Public charity
ALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC
Alpha chi omega shapes the future through the powerful, transformative and everlasting connections of real, strong women.
$494k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
4
Communities
$275k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Education$1.9MHuman Services$70kOther$687k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
donationsfallspringaustin
2021
donations
2022
—
2023
—
2024
abusedomestic violencesheltersexualeducation
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
- $250k+1 grant · $275k
$30,540
Median grant
4
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
- ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION$274,528
- THE SAFE ALLIANCE$79,086
- FRIENDSHIP HOME$30,540
- WACO FAMILY ABUSE CENTER$20,632
- TRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA$18,733
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 4 repeat orgs$648k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
24
Total granted
$2.0M
$499k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+58%
+41%
Still filing today
25%
13%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $149k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +58%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN3× · 2021–2023 · $93k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI2× · 2022–2023 · $70k
Funded once
- SMSOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $125k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINone grant, 2020 · $100k
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $54k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Texas Lutheran University
As a community of faith and learning, texas lutheran university empowers a diverse student body through an education centered on the liberal arts and professional programs. see form 990, part iii, line 1 for continuation of mission…
—
2
Baylor University Medical Center
Faith based acute care hospital providing exemplary patient care, medical education, medical research and community service to residents of the Dallas/Fort Worth twelve county region since 1903.
Health
3
Houston Christian University
To provide instruction for approximately 5,200 students in undergraduate and graduate courses.
—
4
Texas Wesleyan University
Founded in 1890 in fort worth, texas wesleyan university is a united methodist institution with a tradition in the liberal arts and sciences... (continued on sch. o)
Education
5
University of Tulsa
The University of Tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. Guided by our commitment to diversity,…
Education
6
University of Dallas
The university of dallas is dedicated to the pursuit of wisdom, of truth, and of virtue as the proper and primary ends of education. the university seeks to educate its students so they may develop the intellectual and moral virtues,…
Education
7
Oklahoma Christian University
Oklahoma Christian University Exists to educate, mentor, and inspire students to fulfill their potential and transform their lives through Christian faith, scholarship, and service.
Education
8
Baylor Health Care System
Faith based supporting organization providing services to a network of acute care hospitals and related health care entities that provide patient care, medical education, medical research and community services.
Health
9
Southwest Baptist University
Sbu provides undergraduate and graduate degrees & offers a variety of activities, amenities, & scholarships to prepare students to become servant leaders in a global society.
Education
10
Southern Wesleyan University
Challenging students to be dedicated scholars and leaders who impact the world for Christ.
Education
11
University of Central Oklahoma
Funding of college scholarships and support of university programs.
Education
12
Oklahoma Baptist University
A Christian Liberal Arts University.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Abuse Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Baylor University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$1,864,566Other$687,376Human Services$69,905
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WACO FAMILY ABUSE CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Tulsa Community FoundationOK16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · National Geographic Society · University of Pittsburgh · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +58% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 310949882 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity Inc?
Find your warmest path to Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines