· Private foundation
Alpern Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k53 grants · $735k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $325k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CINEMA ARTS CENTRE | $105,000 |
| HOUSES ON THE MOON THEATER COMPANY | $100,000 |
| SOMETHING GOOD IN THE WORLD | $60,000 |
| NEW HOUR FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN | $60,000 |
| ADELPHI UNIV BREAST CANCER HOTLINE & SUPPORT PROGRAM | $40,000 |
| THE RETREAT | $40,000 |
| BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $25,000 |
| CIRCLE OF BLUE | $25,000 |
| LONG ISLAND CRISIS CENTER PRIDE FOR YOUTH | $20,000 |
| SEEDS OF PEACE | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD ADVOCATES | $20,000 |
| GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN | $20,000 |
| RAPE ABUSE & INCEST NATIONAL NETWORK | $20,000 |
| I-TRI | $15,000 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $463k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
82 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNew Community Cinema Club Inc DBA Cinema Arts Centre6× · 2020–2025 · $255k · revenue +11%
- COCIRCLE OF BLUE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +62%
- SGSOMETHING GOOD IN THE WORLD INC6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +99% · 40% of their budget
Funded once
- HSHUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +257%
- R(RAINN (RAPE ABUSE & INCEST NATIONAL NETWORKone grant, 2020 · $25k
- VVVIBS - VICTIM INFORMATION BUREAU OF SUFFOLKone grant, 2020 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.
Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.
The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…
Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.
Connect is dedicated to the prevention and elimination of family and gender violence and to the creation of safe families and peaceful communities.connect transforms the attitudes, beliefs and behaviors that perpetuate gender and family…
Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…
To provide safe housing, critical services, and ground-breaking programs to help homeless women and their children rebuild their lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc and the most unlike its peers is Out of the Box Theatre Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Community Cinema Club Inc DBA Cinema Arts Centre ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE OF BLUE INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds SOMETHING GOOD IN THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOUR FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN LI I ↗
- Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
- Who funds HOUSES ON THE MOON THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds HERSTORY WRITERS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds DANCES FOR A VARIABLE POPULATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
- Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATIONAL TRIATHLON RACING INTERNATIONAL CORP ↗
- Who funds THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds Retreat Inc ↗
- Who funds MADRE INC ↗
- Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC ↗
- Who funds SEPA MUJER INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND TOLERANCE CENTER OF NASSAU COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ARTISTIC REALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds INSPIRICA INC ↗
- Who funds JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Hagedorn Foundation · New York Foundation · New York Council for the Humanities · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · American Express Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alpern Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alpern Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Alpern Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.