Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Alliance to End Hunger

To engage diverse institutions - faith based groups, charities, universities, corporations and others - in building the public and political will to end hunger in the United States and worldwide.

$577k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$90kPhilanthropy$15kCommunity Improvement$8k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $50,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $576,571 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $526,571 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Inc$10,000
United Way of King County$10,000
Hunger Free Vermont$10,000
Oregon Food Bank$10,000
MontCo Anti-Hunger Network$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Arizona Food Bank Network: $10k → 11%MontCo Anti-Hunger Network: $10k → 7%Taproot Foundation: $10k → 10%Volunteer Match: $8k → 10%San Diego Hunger Coalition: $10k → 11%Community Food Advocates: $10k → 17%Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Inc: $10k → 17%Oregon Food Bank: $10k → 12%Second Harvest Food Bank of NE Tenn: $10k → 15%Points of Light: $5k → 13%United Way of King County: $10k → 9%Hunger Free Vermont: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
WA
NY
OR
PA
CA
AZ
TN
GA

Grants abroad, by region — $522k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$522k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Transfer of HUB funds

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank

Reduce hunger by: creating access to high quality, desirable food and other essentials building a responsive regional hunger relief network and disrupting racism, because of its historical and structural connection to hunger and poverty.

Food & Nutrition
7
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
8
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
11
Federation of Virginia Food Banks

Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.

12
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Hunger Coalition and the most unlike its peers is Points of Light Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MONTCO ANTI-HUNGER NETWORK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMONTCO ANTI-HUNGER NETWORKCommunity Food Advocates Inc — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Advocates IncSAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION — $10,000 · Food & NutritionSAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITIONARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORKSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TN — $10,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TNARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INCUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTYTAPFOUND INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTAPFOUND INCPOINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyPOINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATIO…HUNGER FREE VERMONT INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalHUNGER FRE…OREGON FOOD BANK — $10,000 · OtherOREGON FOO…Impact Online Inc — $8,000 · Community Improvement
Food & Nutrition$60,000Philanthropy$25,000Crime & Legal$10,000Other$10,000Community Improvement$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCommunity Food Advocates Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAPFOUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetImpact Online Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

MAZON A Jewish Response to HungerCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger · Share Our Strength · Food Research & Action Center · The Chicago Community Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alliance to End Hunger funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 24%
  • Hunger Free Vermont Inc24% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alliance to End Hunger?

Find your warmest path to Alliance to End Hunger through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph