Skip to content
Alliance for Global Justice Corp at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Alliance for Global Justice Corp

To achieve social change and economic justice by helping to build a stronger and more unified grassroots movement.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$45MCrime & Legal$2.2MCommunity Improvement$579kHuman Services$463kPublic Benefit$452kPhilanthropy$424kEnvironment$238kEmployment$225kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,516,514, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,556,697 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,183 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $281k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
$34,790
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mott HavenPort Morris Community La$1,157,412
Philly Thrive$227,812
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant$53,000
Alianza Indigena Sin Fronteras$34,790
Denver Justice Project$25,000
Community Action Relief Project$13,500
UPAVIM Community Development Founda$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $524k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Afiya Center: $77k → 14%Metcalfe Park Community Bridges: $99k → 17%Black Lives Matter 5280: $20k → 12%Motherful: $5k → 15%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $6k → 9%We Are Better Together Warren Danie: $20k → 16%Make the Homeless Smile Miami: $10k → 15%The Peoples Forum: $27k → 17%UTOPIA Washington: $5k → 9%The Peoples Forum: $16k → 17%UNLOCKING FUTURES: $12k → 17%Equity and Transformation: $215k → 14%UNLOCKIN FUTURES: $12k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36M · 24 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
133

Total granted

$36M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
0%

Still filing today

38%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalCivil RightsArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    Alliance of Families for Justice Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $105k · revenue +495%
  • ST
    Southside Together Organizing For Power
    2× · 2019–2020 · $86k · revenue +236%
  • ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $25k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • BL
    Black Lives Matter - OKC
    one grant, 2021 · $4.3M
  • CF
    Colorado Freedom Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $1.4M
  • AB
    Action Bail Fund New York
    one grant, 2021 · $418k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
2
Black Phoenix Organizing Collective

We prioritize the needs of Black people through two programs: Disability Justice and Reproductive Justice. We believe that supporting mental healthcare, holding and creating space for vulnerability is a piece of how we free ourselves as…

Food & Nutrition
3
Philly Black Worker Project

) to lead and engage in campaigns that empower Black workers to advance our rights and improve job quality in key employment sectors

Civil Rights
4
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
5
The Black Collaborative Inc
Community Improvement
6
Revolution Institute

Revolution Institute's purpose is to liberate the expansive potential of African-American and Latinx communities through sustainable, future-oriented work, entrepreneurship, and value-aligned collaborations.

Employment
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
Pro-Equity Anti-Racism Institute
Philanthropy
9
Carribean Equality Project Inc

The Caribbean Equality Project is an NYC-based community organization that empowers, advocates for, and represents Afro and Indo-Caribbean LGBTQ+ immigrants in New York City.

Human Services
10
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
11
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
12
The Black Organizing Project Inc

The Black Organizing Project is a Black, member-led community organization working for racial, social, and economic justice through grassroots organizing and community building across the Bay Area.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vermont Freedom Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/56
Grantees still filing
25/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Movement for Black Lives: $31,002,996 · OtherMovement for Black LivesBlack Lives Matter - OKC: $4,250,000 · OtherBlack Lives Matter - OKCLouisville Black Lives Matter: $1,656,935 · Other+128 more: $9,849,162 · Other+128 moreSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $292,453 · EducationBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $292,257 · EducationTHE RUCKUS SOCIETY: $167,144 · EducationLIBERATION NYC: $47,367 · EducationFronterizo Fianza Fund: $290,000 · Crime & LegalAlliance of Families for Justice Inc: $104,634 · Crime & LegalARCHCITY DEFENDERS: $82,357 · Crime & LegalEssie Justice Group: $72,257 · Crime & LegalCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE: $20,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $17,500 · Crime & LegalEQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $214,590 · Human ServicesMETCALFE PARK COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC: $99,000 · Human ServicesTHE AFIYA CENTER: $77,000 · Human ServicesPeople's Forum Inc: $43,026 · Human ServicesUNLOCKING FUTURES INC: $24,249 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesWE ARE BETTER TOGETHER WARREN DANIEL HAIRSTON PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBLACK LIVES MATTER 5280: $20,000 · Human Services+4 more: $25,866 · Human ServicesEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $160,116 · Community ImprovementTHE BLACK COLLECTIVE INC: $107,000 · Community ImprovementSouthside Together Organizing For Power: $86,490 · Community ImprovementCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $39,080 · Community ImprovementWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $197,000 · Civil RightsBYP100 Education Fund: $88,357 · Civil RightsDenver Justice Project: $46,500 · Civil Rights+1 more: $10,000 · Civil RightsPHILLY THRIVE: $227,812 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $72,500 · EnvironmentHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $15,000 · Environment+1 more: $10,000 · Environment
Other$46,759,093Education$799,221Crime & Legal$586,748Human Services$543,731Community Improvement$392,686Civil Rights$341,857Environment$325,312

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWomens March Inc: $340,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $292,453 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $292,257 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFronterizo Fianza Fund: $290,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetEQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $214,590 over 1y, 12% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $197,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Aid and Development Corp: $167,257 over 1y, 36% of budgetTHE RUCKUS SOCIETY: $167,144 over 2y, 13% of budgetEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $160,116 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAlliance of Families for Justice Inc: $104,634 over 2y, 14% of budgetMETCALFE PARK COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC: $99,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBYP100 Education Fund: $88,357 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSouthside Together Organizing For Power: $86,490 over 2y, 18% of budgetARCHCITY DEFENDERS: $82,357 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND: $82,257 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $72,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEssie Justice Group: $72,257 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $72,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $68,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $64,596 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIBERATION NYC: $47,367 over 1y, 42% of budgetDenver Justice Project: $46,500 over 2y, 22% of budgetPeople's Forum Inc: $43,026 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCenter for Third World Organizing: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $39,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNLOCKING FUTURES INC: $24,249 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetWorld Beyond War: $24,100 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE ARE BETTER TOGETHER WARREN DANIEL HAIRSTON PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBLACK LIVES MATTER 5280: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPoder in Action: $17,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Spring Plant: $12,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVERMONT FREEDOM FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetBLACK ALLIANCE FOR JUST IMMIGRATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAN UP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSpiritHouse Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetDADE COUNTY STREET RESPONSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetTHE SMILE TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $9,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN CREATORS: $8,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBackbone Campaign: $5,866 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUS LABOR AGAINST RACISM AND WAR INC: $5,500 over 1y, 28% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Womens March Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds Fronterizo Fianza Fund ↗
  • Who funds PHILLY THRIVE ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Aid and Development Corp ↗
  • Who funds THE RUCKUS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT ↗
  • Who funds Black Feminist Future Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BLACK COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Alliance of Families for Justice Inc ↗
  • Who funds METCALFE PARK COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC ↗
  • Who funds BYP100 Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds Southside Together Organizing For Power ↗
  • Who funds ARCHCITY DEFENDERS ↗
  • Who funds TAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Borealis PhilanthropyCommon Counsel Founda…ImpactassetsincTides FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncSolidaire Network IncTides CenterWellspring Philanthro…Proteus Fund IncGroundswell FundTides Advocacy
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC37.7× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Common Counsel Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Solidaire Network Inc · Tides Center · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Groundswell Fund · Tides Advocacy

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alliance for Global Justice Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alliance for Global Justice Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 166 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alliance for Global Justice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home