· Public charity
Alliance for Aging Inc
Alliance for aging ("the alliance") is the area agency on aging for miami-dade and monroe counties.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $50,851,283 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $54,791,106 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,939,823 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $667k
- $250k+19 grants · $50M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED HOME CARE SERVICES | $14,060,711 |
| LITTLE HAVANA ACTIVITIES & NUTRITION CENTERS | $5,659,429 |
| MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY ACTION & HUMAN SERVICES | $5,198,096 |
| FIRST QUALITY HOME CARE | $4,522,216 |
| HIALEAH HOUSING AUTHORITY | $4,286,059 |
| INDEPENDENT LIVING SYSTEMS | $2,855,157 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA | $2,428,282 |
| EASTER SEALS SOUTH FLORIDA | $2,204,274 |
| CITY OF HIALEAH | $2,188,741 |
| CITY OF MIAMI SPRINGS | $1,008,502 |
| ALLAPATTAH COMMUNITY ACTION | $997,585 |
| MONROE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES | $872,279 |
| NORTH MIAMI FOUNDATION | $819,662 |
| SOUTHWEST SOCAL SERVICES PROGRAM | $807,765 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI | $653,275 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $21.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UHUnited Home Care Services Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $65M · revenue +39% · 36% of their budget
- LHLITTLE HAVANA ACTIVITIES AND NUTRITION CENTERS OF DADE COUNTY INC7× · 2017–2024 · $38M · revenue +48%
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC7× · 2017–2024 · $14M · revenue +91%
Funded once
- MSMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF FLORIDA INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $266k · revenue +81%
- UIURGENT INCone grant, 2017 · $81k · revenue -1%
- HPHOMESTEAD POLICE DEPARTMENT 3921one grant, 2017 · $52k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish family home care, inc. is dedicated to empowering individuals, strengthening older adults and families, and protecting the vulnerable by providing exceptional home care and nursing assessments services guided by jewish values,…
Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development.
To provie guardianship services to incapacitated adults of limited financial means in a caring, competent, respectful manor.
Skilled nursing facility to provide medical, continuous nursing, health and social services to patients.
Miami Homes For All's mission is to ensure that everyone in Miami-Dade has a safe, affordable place to call home.
The mission of jessie trice community health system, inc. (the orgainzation) is to improve health equality for our diverse south florida community by providing and increasing access to quality comprehensive primary care services. please…
Provide homebound meals to low or moderate income elederly, rental assisstance, case management and housing inspections for hiv patients in miami dade county.
Florida pace centers' primary exempt purpose is to provide health and supportive services to seniors living at home who meet the state of florida department of elder affairs' requirements for nursing home level care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hope for Grateful Hearts Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Home Care Services Inc ↗
- Who funds LITTLE HAVANA ACTIVITIES AND NUTRITION CENTERS OF DADE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST SOCIAL SERVICES PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds CITY OF HIALEAH EDUCATION ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Allapattah Community Action Inc ↗
- Who funds MIAMI JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Legal Services Archdiocese of Miami Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH MIAMI FOUNDATION FOR SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Unidad of Miami Beach Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR GRATEFUL HEARTS CORP ↗
- Who funds DOUGLAS GARDENS HOME CARE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA KEYS AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds URGENT INC ↗
- Who funds THELMA GIBSON HEALTH INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MASADA HOME CARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · Hfsf Grants Management Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Shepard Broad Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Farm Share Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alliance for Aging Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Coalition Inc — 38% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Miami Inc — 22% of income from government
- Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Easter Seals South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Unidad of Miami Beach Inc — 0% of income from government
- United Home Care Services Inc — 0% of income from government
- Urgent Inc — 0% of income from government
- Allapattah Community Action Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.