Skip to content

· Private foundation

Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$512k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$13MAnimals$5.0MYouth Development$2.2MArts & Culture$1.2MEnvironment$600kEducation$525kHousing & Shelter$310kInternational$300kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $810k
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.8M
$60,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Southampton Animal Shelter Foundation$512,170
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$500,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$250,000
LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY$250,000
JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST$250,000
SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC$200,000
BUFFALO BILL MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION$125,000
DOGS PLAYING FOR LIFE$125,000
Dairy Center for the Arts$100,000
ALLIANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PR$100,000
WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE$100,000
NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$60,000
GLOBAL STRAYS INC$30,000
BISSELL PET FOUNDATION$25,000
Cody Regional Health Foundation$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%National Diaper Bank: $5k → 12%NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $60k → 13%NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $60k → 13%NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%Bridge House: $130k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $100k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $20k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $10k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $10k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
MI
NY
WY
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
NM
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 27 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
16

Total granted

$17M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-2%

Still filing today

78%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CODY CHANGE ATTITUDES NOW INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +39% · 89% of their budget
  • LH
    LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +27%
  • BB
    Buffalo Bill Memorial Association
    5× · 2021–2025 · $897k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • NP
    NY Presbyterian Hospital
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • TS
    The Southampton Animal Shelter Foun
    one grant, 2024 · $700k
  • JB
    JAMES BLACKSTONE MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
2
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
3
La Plata County Humane Society

Animal shelter, spay & neuter, humane treatment of animals.

Animals
4
Yellowstone Valley Animal Shelter

Yellowstone valley animal shelter is dedicated to strengthening the human-animal bond by providing compassionate and high-quality care, education, and resources to the community.

Animals
5
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
6
Southwest Wildlife Conservation Center

Saving our wildlife, one life at a time, by rescuing, rehabilitating, and releasing injured, displaced, and orphaned wildlife, while educating the community on the importance of native wildlife and participating in scientific research

Animals
7
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
8
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
9
Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region

To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)

Animals
10
Noco Humane

Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.

Animals
11
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals
12
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Stock Growers Land Trust; the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cleveland Clinic: $3,750,000 · OtherCleveland ClinicHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $1,250,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERYNY Presbyterian Hospital: $1,000,000 · OtherNY Presbyterian HospitalMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $900,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGThe Southampton Animal Shelter Foun: $700,000 · OtherThe Southampton Animal Shelter FounJAMES BLACKSTONE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $500,000 · OtherCODY REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $425,000 · Other+19 more: $1,531,575 · Other+19 moreMAYO CLINIC: $4,250,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $750,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL F…ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $625,000 · HealthST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUND…+2 more: $17,500 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,932,170 · AnimalsTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANI…LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,265,000 · AnimalsLONGMONT HUMANE SOC…Dogs Playing for Life Inc: $570,000 · AnimalsDogs Playing for Li…GLOBAL STRAYS INC: $190,000 · Animals+3 more: $90,000 · AnimalsCODY CHANGE ATTITUDES NOW INC: $2,075,774 · Youth DevelopmentCODY CHAN…Buffalo Bill Memorial Association: $897,250 · Arts & CultureTHE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $170,000 · Arts & CultureJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $275,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $270,000 · EnvironmentSOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY: $30,000 · Environment+1 more: $15,000 · EnvironmentBridge House: $280,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $215,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$10,056,575Health$5,642,500Animals$4,047,170Youth Development$2,075,774Arts & Culture$1,067,250Environment$590,000Human Services$500,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $4,250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCODY CHANGE ATTITUDES NOW INC: $2,075,774 over 4y, 89% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,932,170 over 4y, 32% of budgetLONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,265,000 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetBuffalo Bill Memorial Association: $897,250 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $750,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $625,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetDogs Playing for Life Inc: $570,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetBridge House: $280,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $275,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $270,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetNATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $215,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetGLOBAL STRAYS INC: $190,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetTHAT OTHER PROJECT: $180,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetTHE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $170,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetALLIANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON: $100,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCODY CAN YOUTH INC: $60,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetBright Futures Mentoring Program: $35,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCODY RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CODY CHANGE ATTITUDES NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Buffalo Bill Memorial Association ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dogs Playing for Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bridge House ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL STRAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds THAT OTHER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON ↗
  • Who funds CODY CAN YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bright Futures Mentoring Program ↗
  • Who funds THE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BISSELL Pet Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Wyoming Community Foundation · Wyoming Philanthropic Trust Inc · Walter & Ursula Eberspacher Foundat · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · Martin D & Jean Shafiroff Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allen Wyoming’s filings →

    More from the funding graph