How much did ALLEN WYOMING FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of ALLEN WYOMING FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

cody changechange attitudesattitudes now

2022

animal

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k8 grants · $120k
$50k–250k7 grants · $688k
$250k+8 grants · $4.0M

$90,000

Median grant

States reached

$23M

Total assets

Largest grants

MAYO CLINIC$750,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC$750,000
The Southampton Animal Shelter Foun$700,000
CODY CHANGE ATTITUDES NOW INC$589,000
BUFFALO BILL MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION$500,000
SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC$250,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$250,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$250,000
LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY$200,000
DOGS PLAYING FOR LIFE$125,000
BUFFALO BILL CENTER OF THE WEST$92,575
THAT OTHER PROJECT$90,000
Dairy Center for the Arts$70,000
NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$60,000
WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $415k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 37% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$16M · 23 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$16M

$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%

+9%

Still filing today

65%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $810k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
Mayo Clinic
5× · 2020–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +29%
CC
CODY CHANGE ATTITUDES NOW INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +107% · 89% of their budget
LH
Longmont Humane Society
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +41%

Funded once

SA
Southampton Animal Shelter
one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -21% · 32% of their budget
NP
NY Presbyterian Hospital
one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
SL
St Lukes Wood River Foundation
one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary

Animals

The Humane Society of Boulder

Our mission: to protect and enhance the lives of companion animals by promoting healthy relationships between pets and people. hsbv is an open admission, socially conscious shelter. hsbv provides safety net services, comprehensive adoption…

Animals

Colorado West Healthcare System

Improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health

Washington Humane Society

To protect animals in the district of columbia and new jersey from cruelty and harm.

Animals

Wolfe Ranch Rescue

Animals

Alpine Humane Society

Animals

Global Animal Partnership

Animals

Montana Natural History Center

The montana natural history center promotes appreciation, understanding, and stewardship of nature and the environment through education.

Environment

Skyeward Bound Ranch

Handicapped children

Human Services

West Side Animal League

To alieviate suffering & destruction of animals by rescuing from shelters,providing veterinary care, placing iin foster & permanent homes & education.

Animals

From the Heart Animal Sanctuary

Animals

Heart of Louisiana Humane Society

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Stock Growers Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Mayo Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

4%1/27

the rest of the field

10%

3,531/36,406

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

25/26

Grantees still filing

22/26

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$9,671,575Health$4,805,000Animals$2,680,000Youth Development$2,075,774Arts & Culture$842,250Human Services$415,000Environment$205,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · The Longmont Community Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALLEN WYOMING FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THAT OTHER PROJECT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 863782000 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THAT OTHER PROJECT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALLEN WYOMING FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

ALLEN WYOMING FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph