· Private foundation
Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k11 grants · $213k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $810k
- $250k+5 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Southampton Animal Shelter Foundation | $512,170 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING | $500,000 |
| LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY | $250,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $250,000 |
| JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST | $250,000 |
| SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC | $200,000 |
| BUFFALO BILL MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION | $125,000 |
| DOGS PLAYING FOR LIFE | $125,000 |
| WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE | $100,000 |
| Dairy Center for the Arts | $100,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PR | $100,000 |
| NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| GLOBAL STRAYS INC | $30,000 |
| BISSELL PET FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| Cody Regional Health Foundation | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCODY CHANGE ATTITUDES NOW INC4× · 2021–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +39% · 89% of their budget
- LHLONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +27%
- BBBuffalo Bill Memorial Association5× · 2021–2025 · $897k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- NPNY Presbyterian Hospitalone grant, 2020 · $1.0M
- TSThe Southampton Animal Shelter Founone grant, 2024 · $700k
- JBJAMES BLACKSTONE MEMORIAL LIBRARYone grant, 2021 · $500k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
Animal shelter, spay & neuter, humane treatment of animals.
Yellowstone valley animal shelter is dedicated to strengthening the human-animal bond by providing compassionate and high-quality care, education, and resources to the community.
Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.
Saving our wildlife, one life at a time, by rescuing, rehabilitating, and releasing injured, displaced, and orphaned wildlife, while educating the community on the importance of native wildlife and participating in scientific research
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)
Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.
One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…
The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Stock Growers Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CODY CHANGE ATTITUDES NOW INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Buffalo Bill Memorial Association ↗
- Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dogs Playing for Life Inc ↗
- Who funds Bridge House ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL STRAYS INC ↗
- Who funds THAT OTHER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON ↗
- Who funds CODY CAN YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Bright Futures Mentoring Program ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds THE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC ↗
- Who funds BISSELL Pet Foundation ↗
- Who funds PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds WYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Wyoming Community Foundation · Wyoming Philanthropic Trust Inc · Walter & Ursula Eberspacher Foundat · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · Martin D & Jean Shafiroff Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Allen Wyoming Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.