Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Allan H Rappaport Charitable Found

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$49kEducation$8kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$2kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$650
Median grant
2
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SAN FRANCISCO$2,229
Individual grant recipient$750
NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER$650
CHABAD OF NORTH BAY$500
MARIN MUSEM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$250
BELVEDERE TIBURON LANDMARKS SOCIETY$60
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $650 → 8%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $500 → 8%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $400 → 8%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $400 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$48k · 10 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$48k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+8%

Still filing today

80%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS
    4× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +19%
  • SB
    Side By Side
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +5%
  • TM
    TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +788%

Funded once

  • OC
    OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF FRENCH-AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • TU
    TAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
3
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
7
Fine Arts Museums Foundation

The specific and primary purposes for which this foundation is formed are the charitable and educational purposes of soliciting, receiving, disbursing and managing funds and property for the embellishment, advancement, administration and…

Arts & Culture
8
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
9
Santa Barbara Museum of Art

To integrate art into the lives of people, fostering imagination, stimulating thought, and creating personally rewarding experiences.

Arts & Culture
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
12
Tacoma Art Museum

Tacoma Art Museum transforms our communities by sharing art that inspires broader perspectives and cultivates a compassionate future

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation of the Fine Arts Museums and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HALLIE FORD MUSEUM OF ART — $27,836 · OtherHALLIE FORD MUSEUM OF ARTFINE ARTS MUSEUMS - LEGION OF HONOR — $2,500 · OtherFINE ARTS MUSEUMS - LEGION OF HONORTAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Other+12 more — $8,000 · Other+12 moreCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $7,729 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ART…OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF FRENCH-AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS — $5,000 · Arts & CultureOFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF FRENC…TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INCYouth in Arts — $1,450 · Arts & CultureYouth in Arts+4 more — $1,110 · Arts & Culture+4 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationTHE UNIVE…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…Side By Side — $2,600 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $600 · HealthNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $1,950 · Human ServicesHAWAII AG AND CULINARY ALLIANCE — $1,500 · Food & NutritionQuincy Animal Shelter Inc — $200 · Animals
Other$40,336Arts & Culture$17,289Education$6,000Health$3,200Human Services$1,950Food & Nutrition$1,500Animals$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $7,729 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSide By Side — $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $1,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII AG AND CULINARY ALLIANCE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYouth in Arts — $1,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEHOUSE INC — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE BEAR SCHOOL of MUSIC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQuincy Animal Shelter Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELVEDERE-TIBURON LANDMARKS SOCIETY — $160 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Bothin Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Allan H Rappaport Charitable Found funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Tampa Museum of Art Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph