Skip to content
Allan H Rappaport Charitable Found at a glance

· Private foundation

Allan H Rappaport Charitable Found

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$49kEducation$8kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$2kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$650
Median grant
2
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SAN FRANCISCO$2,229
Individual grant recipient$750
NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER$650
CHABAD OF NORTH BAY$500
MARIN MUSEM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$250
BELVEDERE TIBURON LANDMARKS SOCIETY$60
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $650 → 8%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $500 → 8%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $400 → 8%NORTH BAY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $400 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48k · 10 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$48k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+8%

Still filing today

80%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS
    4× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +19%
  • SB
    Side By Side
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +5%
  • TM
    TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +788%

Funded once

  • OC
    OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF FRENCH-AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • TU
    TAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
3
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
7
Fine Arts Museums Foundation

The specific and primary purposes for which this foundation is formed are the charitable and educational purposes of soliciting, receiving, disbursing and managing funds and property for the embellishment, advancement, administration and…

Arts & Culture
8
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
9
Santa Barbara Museum of Art

To integrate art into the lives of people, fostering imagination, stimulating thought, and creating personally rewarding experiences.

Arts & Culture
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
12
Tacoma Art Museum

Tacoma Art Museum transforms our communities by sharing art that inspires broader perspectives and cultivates a compassionate future

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation of the Fine Arts Museums; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HALLIE FORD MUSEUM OF ART: $27,836 · OtherHALLIE FORD MUSEUM OF ARTFINE ARTS MUSEUMS - LEGION OF HONOR: $2,500 · OtherFINE ARTS MUSEUMS - LEGION OF HONORTAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Other+12 more: $8,000 · Other+12 moreCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $7,729 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ART…OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF FRENCH-AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureOFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF FRENC…TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INCYouth in Arts: $1,450 · Arts & CultureYouth in Arts+4 more: $1,110 · Arts & Culture+4 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationTHE UNIVE…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…Side By Side: $2,600 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $600 · HealthNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $1,950 · Human ServicesHAWAII AG AND CULINARY ALLIANCE: $1,500 · Food & NutritionQuincy Animal Shelter Inc: $200 · Animals
Other$40,336Arts & Culture$17,289Education$6,000Health$3,200Human Services$1,950Food & Nutrition$1,500Animals$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $7,729 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSide By Side: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $1,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII AG AND CULINARY ALLIANCE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYouth in Arts: $1,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEHOUSE INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE BEAR SCHOOL of MUSIC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQuincy Animal Shelter Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELVEDERE-TIBURON LANDMARKS SOCIETY: $160 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…Leonard & Beryl Buck …Hobsonlucas Family Fo…Bothin FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…
Marin Community FoundationCA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Bothin Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allan H Rappaport Charitable Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allan H Rappaport Charitable Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Tampa Museum of Art Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allan H Rappaport Charitable Found’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home