Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

All for the East End Inc

Aftee is a source of advocacy and funding for the non-profit community in the five east end towns of long island.

$19k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Food & Nutrition$160kEnvironment$10kYouth Development$10k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$19,447
Median grant
1
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK$19,447
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 49% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%PECONIC LAND TRUST: $10k → 7%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $19k → 17%THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$116k · 3 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$116k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+51%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    East End Food Institute
    2× · 2021–2022 · $75k · revenue +9%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +32%
  • PL
    PECONIC LAND TRUST INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $16k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • AW
    AMBER WAVES FARM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +51%
  • HO
    HEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +7%
  • TB
    THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +183%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Field & Fork Network

Field & fork network connects communities to innovative solutions that foster a sustainable food system. the 4 areas of focus include: food access, agriculture economic development, youth development and healthy neighborhoods.

2
Wolfe's Neck Farm Foundation

The mission of Wolfe's Neck Center for Agriculture & The Environment is to transform our relationship with farming and food for a healthier planet.

Philanthropy
3
Peconic Public Broadcasting

Peconic Public Broadcasting is a public FM radio station located in Southampton, New York. The station services Long Island and coastal Connecticut and offers listeners both national and local programs.

4
New York Agricultural Land Trust Inc

The mission of the Organization is to conserve working farmland and promote a greater appreciation for the agricultural and forested lands and their associated natural resources that enrich our communities and connect future generations to…

Environment
5
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
6
Farm Training Collective Nyc Inc

The goal of Farm School NYC is to train the next generation of farmers in New York City and beyond, with a focus on limited resourced and socially disadvantaged individuals and communities, and to increase access to healthy, local food in…

Education
7
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
8
Earth Matter Ny Inc

The organization is based on governor's island whose mission is to reduce the organic waste misdirected into new york city's landfills by encouraging neighbor participation and leadership in composting.

Environment
9
Rewild Long Island Inc

ReWild Long Island is dedicated to collaborating with local communities across Long Island to protect and improve the biodiversity, resilience and health of regional ecosystems. This is achieved by adopting sustainable landscaping…

Environment
10
East Hampton Food Pantry Inc

To provide food to individuals who live in east hampton, ny and are in need due to hardship and or emergenies

Food & Nutrition
11
Western Ny Coalition of Farmworker Serving Agencies Inc

To promote justice, dignity, and equity for migrants and farmworkers through advocacy, education, outreach, and direct services. We empower our communities to achieve self-sufficiency by fostering collaboration among partners.

Human Services
12
Added Value & Herban Solutions Inc

Added Value's mission is to promote the sustainable development of Red Hook through the operation of a socially responsible urban farm while growing healthy food for members of the community and those in-need and

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action of Southold Town Inc and the most unlike its peers is Research Foundation of the City University of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

East End Food Institute — $75,000 · Food & NutritionEast End Food InstituteAMBER WAVES FARM INC — $15,000 · Food & NutritionAMBER WAVES FARM INCHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD — $10,000 · Food & NutritionHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTDCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC — $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTIO…Research Foundation of the City University of New York — $19,447 · EducationResearch Fou…PECONIC LAND TRUST INC — $16,000 · EnvironmentPECONIC LA…THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc — $9,499 · Human Services
Food & Nutrition$100,000Other$25,000Education$19,447Environment$16,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$9,499

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEast End Food Institute — $75,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $19,447 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMBER WAVES FARM INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetBridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc — $9,499 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Yaffa Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization All for the East End Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to All for the East End Inc?

    Find your warmest path to All for the East End Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph