Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

All Americans Vote

All Americans Vote aims to motivate underrepresented Americans to engage in the most patriotic of exercises - voting!

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Public Benefit$5.0MEducation$3.3MPhilanthropy$1.9MCivil Rights$599kCommunity Improvement$150kCrime & Legal$68kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $312k
  • $250k+3 grants · $9.8M
$75,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Civitech$5,004,405
Notley Impact$3,270,793
Woke Vote$1,500,000
HeadCount$111,504
Project I Voted Inc$75,000
NAACP$75,000
Hub 3$50,000
Hispanic Federation$25,000
Arts Lab dba Common Cause Education Fund$20,000
Hopewell Fund$20,000
Vote America$19,000
Committment to Excellence Inc$11,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Big Tent Project Fund: $2.8M → 11%RepresentUS Education Fund: $50k → 12%As I Plant This Seed: $13k → 22%Commonwealth Foundation Inc: $50k → 10%Spread the Vote Inc: $249k → 14%HeadCount: $112k → 17%Notley Impact: $3.3M → 10%Civitech: $5.0M → 16%The Foundation for Social Impact: $125k → 17%Hub 3: $50k → 14%Alianza Center: $25k → 13%Woke Vote: $1.5M → 16%Ameelio Inc: $18k → 12%BVM Capacity Building Institute Inc: $25k → 13%MomsRising Education Fund: $50k → 9%NAACP CE Protect Our People: $200k → 19%Project I Voted Inc: $75k → 17%Defending Democracy Together: $250k → 14%NAACP: $75k → 19%Head Count Inc: $25k → 17%Leadership Center for AG Studies: $50k → 14%Hispanic Federation: $25k → 17%We The Action: $50k → 14%Arts Lab dba Common Cause Education Fund: $20k → 14%New Venture Fund: $1.7M → 14%Hopewell Fund: $20k → 14%Fair Elections Center: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MD
DE
AR
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Democracy Works Inc

The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.

Civil Rights
2
Voteorg

Vote.org's primary purpose is to build web-based technologies that remove barriers to voting and increase vote turnout.

Civil Rights
3
Secure Election Project Inc

To preserve and protect the sanctity of our vote by promoting commonsense, nonpartisan election security reforms that prevent hacking and fraud without restricting eligible citizens from accessing the polls.

Public Benefit
4
Verified Voting Foundation

Strengthen democracy for all voters by promoting the responsible use of technology in all elections.

—
5
The Center for Election Innovation & Research

CEIR seeks to restore trust in the American election system and promote election procedures that encourage participation while ensuring election integrity and security.

Civil Rights
6
New American Leaders Action Fund Inc

New american leaders action fund (nalaf) is building a democracy that represents and includes all people by engaging new voters, supporting new americans as they run for office, and expanding civic engagement.

Civil Rights
7
Register America

The organization is founded for social welfare purposes, including assisting with voter registration and advocating for policies which lead to increased voter registration in the united states.

—
8
The Campaign Legal Center Inc

The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…

Crime & Legal
9
Secure Democracy Usa

Secure Democracy USA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works to build stronger elections, state by state.

Civil Rights
10
Coalition for Dc Representation in Congress Education Fund

Founded in 1998, dc vote is a national citizen engagement and advocacy organization dedicated to strengthening democracy and securing equality for all in the district of columbia.

Education
11
Right Vote Inc
Civil Rights
12
Fair Count Inc

Fair count builds long-term power within historically undercounted communities. with the census as our north star, we use every iteration of civic participation as a catalyst to build a more equitable democracy.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund and the most unlike its peers is Big Tent Project Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportPregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 12. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%8%<5yr16%42%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr10%17%35–55yr13%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%62%5–10yr20%28%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr10%6%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
2/29
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,775

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/26
Grantees still filing
9/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Civitech — $5,004,405 · OtherCivitechBig Tent Project Fund — $2,750,000 · OtherBig Tent Project FundWoke Vote — $1,500,000 · OtherWoke Vote+7 more — $580,000 · Other+7 moreNOTLEY IMPACT — $3,270,793 · EducationNOTLEY IMPACT+1 more — $11,000 · EducationNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,675,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE…SPREAD THE VOTE INC — $249,000 · Civil RightsNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $200,000 · Civil RightsHEAD COUNT INC — $136,504 · Civil RightsIMPACT DATA & EVENTS INC — $75,000 · Civil RightsFair Elections Center — $75,000 · Civil RightsTHE LEADERSHIP CENTER FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL STUDIES — $50,000 · Civil RightsHUB3 — $50,000 · Civil RightsVOTEAMERICA — $38,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $50,000 · Civil RightsTIDES FOUNDATION — $107,500 · PhilanthropyMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $50,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND — $20,000 · PhilanthropyRepresentUs Education Fund — $50,000 · Public BenefitCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $20,000 · Public BenefitHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$9,834,405Education$3,281,793Environment$1,675,000Civil Rights$923,504Philanthropy$177,500Public Benefit$70,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNOTLEY IMPACT — $3,270,793 over 1y, 30% of budgetBig Tent Project Fund — $2,750,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,675,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER — $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPREAD THE VOTE INC — $249,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEAD COUNT INC — $136,504 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFoundation for Social Impact — $125,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $107,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE-GROUP — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIMPACT DATA & EVENTS INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFair Elections Center — $75,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWETHEACTION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CENTER FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL STUDIES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHUB3 — $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVOTEAMERICA — $38,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALIANZA CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMEELIO INC — $17,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCommitment to Excellence Inc — $11,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Venture FundTides FoundationHopewell FundImpactassetsincAmalgamated Charitabl…NEO Philanthropy IncSilicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…
New Venture FundDC18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Impactassetsinc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization All Americans Vote funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Alianza Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to All Americans Vote?

Find your warmest path to All Americans Vote through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines