· Private foundation
Alice Rosenwald Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STEP BY STEP SUPPORTED LIVING INC | $1,250,000 |
| STEP BY STEP SUPPORTED LIVING INC | $200,000 |
| MCLEAN HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| MCLEAN HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| MCLEAN HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| MCLEAN HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL | $15,000 |
| JCC ROCKLAND | $6,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $5,000 |
| LIFE RECAPTURED INC | $5,000 |
| NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN | $5,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $5,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $5,000 |
| NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN | $5,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LULEHIGH UNIVERSITY2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +18%
- JRJCC ROCKLAND INC5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +65%
- OOOLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INC3× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +26%
Funded once
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATESgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +40%- CRCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -67%
- TGThe Goldberg Charitable Corporationone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operating as an integral part of the nyc health + hospitals ("h+h"), formerly the new york city health and hospitals corporation. nyda will further h+h's tax-exempt charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by enhancing the…
Diverse racial and ethnic communities relations. promote understanding and cooperation between and among ethnic groups and reduce tensions among diverse racial and ethnic communities.
The economic club of new york is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, nonpolitical organization dedicated to the promotion of the study and discussion of social, economic and political questions. for more than a century, the club has served as the…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Vision: drive positive change through the power of design and focused activism.mission: aia inspires and empowers architects to improve society and transform the world.
To preserve and steward aquidneck island's open spaces for the lasting benefit of the community while connecting people with the land that defines the island's natural character.
To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
The evergreens, located in brooklyn, new york is a nonsectarian not-for-profit membership corporation and is a regulated cemetery corporation under the new york state cemetery law. its mission is to sell lots, graves and other space to the…
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian Americans for Equality Inc and the most unlike its peers is Inspirational Triathlon Racing International Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds JCC ROCKLAND INC ↗
- Who funds OLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE RECAPTURED INC ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds THE CLAMSHELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF DENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATIONAL TRIATHLON RACING INTERNATIONAL CORP ↗
- Who funds Amateur Astronomers Association ↗
- Who funds SPRINGS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ACADEMY OF DENTISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN C SANDERSON MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds ARMENIAN CULTURAL & EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds TURTLE RESCUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alice Rosenwald Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alice Rosenwald Fund?
Find your warmest path to Alice Rosenwald Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.