Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice and Jaclyn Houseknecht Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$288kHuman Services$248kEducation$91kHealth$86kEnvironment$69kArts & Culture$49kYouth Development$26kCommunity Improvement$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$3,030
SAVE THE CHILDREN$3,000
HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,750
FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE$2,500
UNITED HELP UKRAINE$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$2,000
SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000
KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH$1,500
THE JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE$1,000
FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$1,000
MONTAUK PLAYHOUSE COMMUNITY FDN$1,000
NYY LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS$1,000
USA FOR UNHCR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $217k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $10k → 12%EAST END HOSPICE: $1k → 7%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $1k → 20%UNITED HELP UKRAINE: $3k → 4%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $10k → 12%EAST END HOSPICE: $1k → 7%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $5k → 12%EAST END HOSPICE: $500 → 7%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $5k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $2k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $2k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $2k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $1k → 12%THE RETREAT: $2k → 7%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $1k → 12%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 6%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $1k → 7%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 6%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $1k → 7%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $1k → 7%THE RETREAT: $500 → 7%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $500 → 7%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $500 → 7%THE RETREAT: $500 → 7%APOPO US: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%APOPO US INC: $1k → 14%RED CROSS: $1k → 14%APOPO US INC: $1k → 14%APOPO US: $500 → 14%RED CROSS: $500 → 14%LUV MICHAEL: $500 → 17%THE PAPER FIG FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $66k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $20k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $18k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $13k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $10k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $8k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $3k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Alice and Jaclyn Houseknecht Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 35%.

Alice and Jaclyn Houseknecht Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$901k · 89 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

89 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

89
53

Total granted

$901k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+4%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $143k · revenue +50%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $93k · revenue +38%
  • TH
    THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • TN
    The New Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +35%
  • PF
    PLUS Fund Paid Leave for the United States
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -98%
  • TC
    THE CLAMSHELL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mouse King Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
101/104
Grantees still filing
64/104
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CARTER CENTER INC: $92,500 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INCMercy Corps: $40,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $29,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA…Save The Children Federation Inc: $19,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $18,500 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE…+16 more: $43,967 · International+16 moreTHE SALVATION ARMY: $24,130 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHIRTEEN: $21,500 · OtherTHIRTEENMONTAUK VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,000 · OtherMONTAUK VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INCCARE: $14,000 · OtherUSA FOR UNHCR-UN REFUGEE AGENCY: $13,500 · OtherTHE RETREAT-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $13,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $11,700 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $14,000 · Other+79 more: $166,154 · Other+79 moreFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $143,080 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INCKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $37,500 · Human ServicesKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA &…SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIA…+9 more: $24,564 · Human Services+9 moreTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $61,750 · EducationThe New School: $10,000 · EducationPROJECT MOST INC: $3,500 · Education+2 more: $2,500 · EducationAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC: $36,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · HealthFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $7,750 · Health+7 more: $6,750 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $16,500 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $8,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $6,500 · EnvironmentTHE CLAMSHELL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentCONCERNED CITIZENS OF MONTAUK: $4,500 · EnvironmentGROUP FOR THE EAST END INC: $4,250 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $3,800 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $2,000 · Environment+5 more: $4,750 · EnvironmentFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth Development
International$243,467Other$294,984Human Services$221,144Education$77,750Health$64,500Environment$55,300Youth Development$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $143,080 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $92,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $61,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Corps: $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $37,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC: $36,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $29,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $19,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $18,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMONTAUK VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,000 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $16,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe New School: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $7,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTAUK FIRE DEPARTMENT: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE EAST END I: $6,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LADIES VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY OF EAST HAMPTON: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMICROFINANCING PARTNERS IN AFRICA: $5,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLAMSHELL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS OF MONTAUK: $4,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEARL HEINLEIN FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROUP FOR THE EAST END INC: $4,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $3,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAPOPO US INC: $3,564 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT MOST INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAITI PROJECT INC: $3,300 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetINTEGRAL BALLET SCHOOL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRetreat Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $2,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPADDLERS FOR HUMANITY INC: $2,609 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTOGETHER RISING: $2,520 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTAUK VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds United Help Ukraine Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTAUK FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE EAST END I ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LADIES VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY OF EAST HAMPTON ↗
  • Who funds MICROFINANCING PARTNERS IN AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds PLUS Fund Paid Leave for the United States ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds THE CLAMSHELL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Andrew Sabin Family FoundationNY24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Andrew Sabin Family Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc · The Donald and Barbara Zucker Family Foundation · Widder Foundation Inc · The Maryam and Hervey Seley Foundation · Kate Cassidy Foundation · The Jct Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Janet & Robert W Postma Foundation · Maude Pritchard Char Trust Xxxxx2009 · Yaffa Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice and Jaclyn Houseknecht Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice and Jaclyn Houseknecht Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 150 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alice and Jaclyn Houseknecht’s filings →

More from the funding graph