Skip to content
Alice and George Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Alice and George Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$111kHealth$17kHuman Services$16kArts & Culture$8kRecreation & Sports$6kReligion$3kYouth Development$2kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,109
Median grant
2
States reached
$519k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESTORE NYC$7,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$3,109
Individual grant recipient$2,500
FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL MUSEUM$670
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY: $1k → 10%CYCLING FOR CHANGE: $120 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
23

Total granted

$159k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+26%

Still filing today

73%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD
    6× · 2019–2024 · $56k · revenue +9%
  • TB
    The Browning School
    6× · 2019–2024 · $54k · revenue +38%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $6k · revenue +154%

Funded once

  • PA
    PAROISSE ARMENIENNE CATHOLIQUE DE VALENCE
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • TN
    The New York Community Hospital of Brooklyn Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +24%
  • RF
    RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
2
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
3
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
8
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
9
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
12
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Madison Square Boys & Girls Club; the most unlike its peers is The Paros Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $56,000 · EducationTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTDThe Browning School: $53,500 · EducationThe Browning School+4 more: $2,375 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $6,015 · OtherIndividual gra…FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL MUSEUM: $5,770 · OtherFRIENDS OF RAY…PAROISSE ARMENIENNE CATHOLIQUE DE VALENCE: $3,000 · OtherPAROISSE ARMEN…Individual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $1,000 · OtherEAST ACADEMY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY: $1,000 · OtherNEW VICTORY CHILDRENS THEATER: $1,000 · OtherTHE PAROS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Other+9 more: $3,199 · Other+9 moreRESTORE NYC INC: $16,150 · Human ServicesRESTORE NYC…RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC: $1,054 · Human ServicesRUNWAY FOR …+1 more: $120 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,750 · HealthAMERICAN …The New York Community Hospital of Brooklyn Inc: $2,000 · HealthThe New Y…BONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $721 · HealthCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,126 · Youth DevelopmentMadison Square Boys & Girls Club: $500 · Youth DevelopmentInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 · InternationalSOCIAL PROMISE INC: $500 · International
Education$111,875Other$22,984Human Services$17,324Health$14,471Recreation & Sports$6,000Youth Development$1,626International$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $56,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Browning School: $53,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE NYC INC: $16,150 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Community Hospital of Brooklyn Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,126 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC: $1,054 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $721 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR MARINE EDUCATION & RECREATION: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL PROMISE INC: $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH RENEWAL FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMadison Square Boys & Girls Club: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BAY INC: $263 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOYSTER BAY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYCLING FOR CHANGE INC: $120 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEACHING MATTERS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Del Vecchio Family Fo…The Bahnik Foundation…The Pamela Howard Fam…The New York Communit…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Del Vecchio Family FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Del Vecchio Family Foundation · The Bahnik Foundation Inc · The Pamela Howard Family Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice and George Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice and George Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alice and George Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alice and George Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alice and George Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home