Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alfred A & Hanina Z Shasha Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.5MEnvironment$580kReligion$334kInternational$308kCivil Rights$283kYouth Development$184kEducation$158kArts & Culture$143kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA Federation$84,550
Making Peace Visible$25,000
AJC Transatlantic Institute$25,000
Westchester Jewish Council$21,122
Nature Conservancy$20,000
American Jewish Committee$10,000
American Sephardi Federation$9,000
ISEF$5,000
PEF Israel Endowment Funds Inc$5,000
Pomfret School$4,000
Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy$3,600
Stand with Us$3,600
Project Lyme$3,000
DOROT Inc$2,000
The Netherland-America Foundation$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Fisherman Mark: $500 → 4%Chai4Ever: $1k → 11%Fisherman Mark: $360 → 4%DOROT Inc: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
LA
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 23% of Alfred A & Hanina Z Shasha Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Alfred A & Hanina Z Shasha Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 25 repeat orgs$617k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
20

Total granted

$1.6M
$585k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+9%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCivil RightsArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $512k · revenue +39%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $198k · revenue +116%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SEPHARDI FEDERATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • AF
    American Friends of the Hebrew
    one grant, 2017 · $300k
  • TW
    THE WATERSHED CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -6%
  • JA
    JDC Arlene Fern School
    one grant, 2017 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
The Jerusalem Connection
6
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
7
Sherit Isroel
8
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
9
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish News Service Inc

See schedule ojewish news service, inc. ("jns") was organized as a non-profit corporation under the general laws of massachusetts and is an independent business resource and syndication service covering jewish news and israel news for…

Education
11
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
12
American Council for World Jewry Inc

Founded so jews, worldwide, can join together in partnership, ensuring our common good and coolective survival. the council acts in the belief that the key to successfully countering threats against the jewish people and the state if…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Policy Forum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsCancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceIndependent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Health CentersSubstance Abuse TreatmentGovernment Accountability R…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Land Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr13%57%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,528

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $580,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYAmerican Friends of the Hebrew — $300,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of the HebrewISEF — $292,500 · OtherISEFJDC Arlene Fern School — $100,000 · OtherJDC Arlene Fern SchoolFilmmakers Collaborative — $64,000 · Other+34 more — $281,462 · Other+34 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,000,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABL…THE WATERSHED CENTER INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHE WATERSHED CENTER INCUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $511,800 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEA…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $162,500 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMEN…+2 more — $29,200 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $197,860 · Civil RightsNonprofit VOTE Inc — $15,000 · Civil RightsUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA — $8,200 · Civil RightsAMERICAN SEPHARDI FEDERATION — $183,115 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $43,960 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $27,400 · InternationalMAKING PEACE VISIBLE INC — $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $13,800 · InternationalEDUCATION FOR EMPLOYMENT — $8,600 · International+3 more — $4,600 · InternationalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $85,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,617,962Community Improvement$1,100,000Philanthropy$703,500Civil Rights$221,060Youth Development$183,115International$123,360Crime & Legal$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $580,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $511,800 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $197,860 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SEPHARDI FEDERATION — $183,115 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $162,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WATERSHED CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $43,960 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $27,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COUNCIL INC — $24,922 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetNonprofit VOTE Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY INC — $14,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $13,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION FOR EMPLOYMENT — $8,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA — $8,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT LYME — $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN — $5,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALGEMEINER INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLE RESOURCE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFishermans Mark — $860 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY23.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alfred A & Hanina Z Shasha Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Chai 4EVER Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alfred A & Hanina Z Shasha Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Alfred A & Hanina Z Shasha Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph