· Private foundation
Alexander C Macintyre Charitable Trust II
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k71 grants · $52k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Charles Schwab Advise Fund | $120,000 |
| Miami FDN Give Miami | $7,845 |
| Dade Heritage Trust | $7,775 |
| Cure Duchenne | $7,500 |
| Plymouth Congregational Church | $2,125 |
| Jackson Historical Society | $2,100 |
| Green Bean Ski Club | $2,000 |
| Coconut Grove Sailing Club | $1,600 |
| The Barnacle Society | $1,400 |
| Junior League | $1,211 |
| Coconut Grove Elementary PTA | $1,145 |
| Frederic Remington Art Museum | $1,100 |
| Coral Gables Garden Club | $1,070 |
| Lustgarten Foundation | $1,057 |
| Castaways Against Cancer | $1,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
71 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
NORTHFIELD MOUNT HERMON SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +40%- PAPHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC4× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +65%
- CGCORAL GABLES GARDEN CLUB INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +226%
Funded once
- FTFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +15%
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +147%
- FGFAIRCHILD GARDENone grant, 2021 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…
The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)
Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…
The mission of the Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa a/k/a ZooTampa at Lowry Park, is to rescue, rehabilitate and care for animals.(Expanded mission on Schedule O)ZooTampa creates exceptional personalized experiences that connect…
Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…
The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."
Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.
Helping to build puerto rico's future by preserving both the social and natural history and disseminating the values, philosophy and ideas of luis muoz marn and promoting them in identifying and solving the island's most urgent problems.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Florida Public Media Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Montgomery Botanical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DADE HERITAGE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHFIELD MOUNT HERMON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CURE DUCHENNE ↗
- Who funds FREDERIC REMINGTON ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PHILLIP AND PATRICIA FROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF COCONUT GROVE ↗
- Who funds CORAL GABLES GARDEN CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds VILLAGERS INC ↗
- Who funds PTA FL CONGRESS COCONUT GROVE ELEM PTA ↗
- Who funds COCONUT GROVE SAILING CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARNACLE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CORAL GABLES MUSEUM CORP ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds CASTAWAYS AGAINST CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The James and Sallye Jude Charitable Trust · The Kirk Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · Cobb Family Foundation Inc · Coral Gables Community Foundation Inc · The Shepard Broad Foundation Inc · Westminster Barrington Foundation · Yablick Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alexander C Macintyre Charitable Trust II funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Florida Humanities Council Inc — 100% of income from government
- The Kennedy Collective Inc — 79% of income from government
- Kristi House Inc — 49% of income from government
- Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc — 19% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc — 4% of income from government
- Historical Association of Southern Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science Inc — 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Montgomery Botanical Center — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- Zoo Miami Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.