Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alex and Marie Manoogian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$3.8MReligion$2.4MEducation$822kHuman Services$160kPhilanthropy$125kPublic Benefit$100kMembership Benefit$75kInternational$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $278k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.3M
$53,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Armenian Apostolic Society Inc$1,283,650
St John Foundation$125,000
Center for Armenian Studies University of Michigan$100,000
St John's Armenian Church$53,400
Armenian Apostolic Society Inc$46,000
Armenian General Benevolent Union - Special Project$25,000
AGBU Alex & Marie Manoogian School$22,097
DAC Foundation$9,339
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $80k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $80k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 12 repeat orgs$880k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +149% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$6.8M
$749k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+149%
+2%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $131k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +14%
  • CS
    CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN
    2× · 2020–2021 · $160k · revenue +50%
  • AU
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN -COLLEGE OF
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • UO
    University of Michigan - LSA
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF THE ARMENIAN CHURCH OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Athletic Club

To create life-enriching experiences that build meaningful relations, foster personal and professional growth, and celebrate culture in the heart of detroit.

—
2
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
3
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
4
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
5
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

—
6
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
7
Michigan Credit Union League

Strengthen the credit union community and its image by providing advocacy on important issues, coordinating cooperative initiatives and by providing high-quality solutions that help credit unions succeed and enrich the lives of their…

—
8
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
9
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

—
10
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
11
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
12
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dmc Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Team Armenia Basketball. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $3,750,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTSARMENIAN APOSTOLIC SOCIETY: $1,742,150 · OtherARMENIAN APOSTOLIC SOCIETYST JOHNS ARMENIAN CHURCH: $364,400 · OtherST JOHNS ARMENIAN CHURCHSt John Foundation: $250,000 · OtherSt John FoundationUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN -COLLEGE OF: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN -COLLEGE OFUniversity of Michigan - LSA: $200,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan - LSA+11 more: $759,936 · Other+11 moreCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $160,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION: $100,000 · EducationMayors Residence Society: $100,000 · Public BenefitCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $60,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TEAM ARMENIA BASKETBALL: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsNEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Arts & Culture$3,750,000Other$3,516,486Human Services$160,000Education$100,000Public Benefit$100,000International$60,000Recreation & Sports$19,000Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $3,750,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $160,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMayors Residence Society: $100,000 over 2y, 91% of budgetCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $25,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF TEAM ARMENIA BASKETBALL: $15,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Mayors Residence Society ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TEAM ARMENIA BASKETBALL ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds DMC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Edward & Helen Mardigian Foundation · Afeyan Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alex and Marie Manoogian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alex and Marie Manoogian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alex and Marie Manoogian Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alex and Marie Manoogian Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alex and Marie Manoogian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph