Skip to content
Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$354kPhilanthropy$60kCrime & Legal$50kFood & Nutrition$30kHuman Services$20kCommunity Improvement$20kEnvironment$10kEducation$8k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $90,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $95,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$854M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY$20,000
NORTH 24TH STREET BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSOCIATION$20,000
OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
NO MORE EMPTY POTS$20,000
NEIGHBORGOOD COMMUNITY PANTRY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $50k → 12%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
3
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

—
4
North Omaha Collective

To build the capacity of youth serving organizations, service providers, families and community to claim their voice, cultivate healing and take courageous action to improve their overall health and well being.

Human Services
5
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

—
6
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
7
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
8
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
9
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
10
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
11
Omaha Permaculture

Omaha Permaculture fosters community through sustainable land stewardship.

—
12
Omaha ForUs Inc

Omaha forus builds intentional community and creates equitable space in service to lgbtq+ individuals and families of eastern nebraska and western iowa.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Bridges Out of Poverty Inc; the most unlike its peers is NeighborGood Community Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $353,716 · HealthCHI HEALTH FOUNDATIONJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA: $50,000 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FOR OU…OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesOMAHA BRIDGES …Omaha Community Foundation: $59,839 · PhilanthropyOmaha Commun…NO MORE EMPTY POTS: $20,000 · Food & NutritionNeighborGood Community Pantry: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNORTH 24TH STREET BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT D: $20,000 · Community ImprovementOmaha Botanical Center Inc: $10,000 · EnvironmentCUES FUND: $7,500 · Religion
Health$353,716Human Services$70,000Philanthropy$59,839Food & Nutrition$30,000Community Improvement$20,000Environment$10,000Religion$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $353,716 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetOmaha Community Foundation: $59,839 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH 24TH STREET BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT D: $20,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetOmaha Botanical Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUES FUND: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationAlegent Health - Berg…The Sherwood Foundati…The Charles and Mary …Midlands Community Fo…Weitz Family Foundati…Nebraska Community Fo…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Lozier FoundationNE19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · Alegent Health - Bergan Mercy Health System · The Sherwood Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Midlands Community Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home