Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aldridge Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.5MEducation$1.4MRecreation & Sports$824kArts & Culture$376kInternational$205kPhilanthropy$105kYouth Development$101kReligion$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $228k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $496k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$15,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAKTHROUGH TYPE 1 DIABETES$750,000
MAYO CLINIC$433,334
UW FOUNDATION - WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$98,500
GREEN HOUSE SCHOLARS$90,000
MINOCQUA WINTER PARK FOUNDATION INC$82,000
MIAMI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$75,000
TUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC$50,000
HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION$50,000
BEAVERS CHARITABLE TRUST$50,000
LAMBS FARM$40,050
LYRIC OPERA$40,000
WAUKEGAN TO COLLEGE$33,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$25,000
THE COMMUNITY CHURCH$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%LITTLE FRIENDS: $5k → 7%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%LITTLE FRIENDS: $5k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $5k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $5k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $5k → 7%BEACON PLACE: $5k → 8%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OH
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 31 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
26

Total granted

$4.9M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+31%

Still filing today

58%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $858k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    5× · 2017–2023 · $782k · revenue +49%
  • GS
    GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $367k · revenue +213%
  • BT
    BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $205k · revenue +212%

Funded once

  • MW
    MINOCQUA WINTER PARK TRAIL
    one grant, 2020 · $493k
  • J
    JDRF
    one grant, 2021 · $333k
  • HH
    Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

—
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Friends Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aldridge Gives Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC: $1,435,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICBREAKTHROUGH TYPE 1 DIABETES: $750,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH TYPE 1 DIABETESMINOCQUA WINTER PARK TRAIL: $493,000 · OtherMINOCQUA WINTER PARK TRAILUW FOUNDATION - WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $466,000 · OtherUW FOUNDATION - WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF BUSINESSJDRF: $333,000 · OtherJDRFMINOCQUA WINTER PARK FOUNDATION INC: $305,981 · OtherMINOCQUA WINTER PARK FOUNDATION INCLYRIC OPERA: $185,000 · Other+38 more: $662,150 · Other+38 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $782,300 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH …+1 more: $2,000 · HealthGREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $366,500 · EducationGREENHOUSE S…Waukegan To College NFP: $185,000 · EducationWaukegan To …Miami University Foundation: $150,000 · EducationMiami Univer…PERSPECTIVES CHARTER SCHOOLS: $25,000 · Education+3 more: $15,500 · EducationBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $205,000 · InternationalHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · PhilanthropyBEAVERS CHARITABLE TRUST: $50,000 · PhilanthropyALDRIDGE GIVES FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $8,200 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureBEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Beacon Place NFP: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$4,630,131Health$784,300Education$742,000International$205,000Philanthropy$170,000Arts & Culture$168,700Human Services$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $782,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $366,500 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $205,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWaukegan To College NFP: $185,000 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetMiami University Foundation: $150,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetProvidence St Mel School: $128,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $65,050 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEAVERS CHARITABLE TRUST: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetALDRIDGE GIVES FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $36,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPERSPECTIVES CHARTER SCHOOLS: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPGA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTART EARLY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOODS LAND TRUST INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $8,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAccelerate Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO POLICE MARINE CORPS LEAGUE: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE JACKSON CHANCE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMPANILE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Waukegan To College NFP ↗
  • Who funds Miami University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Providence St Mel School ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMBS FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds TUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEAVERS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ALDRIDGE GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERSPECTIVES CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds PGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds START EARLY ↗
  • Who funds THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL17.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Dr Scholl Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Aldridge Gives Foundation · Lavin Family Foundation · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · Carol Bernick Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aldridge Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aldridge Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aldridge Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph