Skip to content
Alden H Vose Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Alden H Vose Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$13kAnimals$11kReligion$7kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kCrime & Legal$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$160
Median grant
15
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST DUNSTANS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$500
PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE$500
FREE 2 LIVE$450
CIMARRON VALLEY HUMAN SOCIETY$300
OUR DAILY BREAD$300
WINGS OF HOPE$300
MISSION OF HOPE$300
SETON HALL LAW SCHOOL$250
Individual grant recipient$250
TREVOR FOUNDATION$200
ROLLING DOG FARM$200
STILLWATER HUMANE SOCIETY$200
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH$200
TINY PAWS KITTEN RESCUE$190
PAYNE COUNTY UNITED WAY$160
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%WINGS OF HOPE: $300 → 19%WINGS OF HOPE: $300 → 19%WINGS OF HOPE: $300 → 19%WINGS OF HOPE: $300 → 19%WINGS OF HOPE: $200 → 19%WINGS OF HOPE: $200 → 19%WINGS OF HOPE: $200 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 38 repeat orgs$775 to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
1

Total granted

$45k
$250

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+90%

Still filing today

55%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $525 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +11%
  • FT
    FREE TO LIVE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +129%
  • SD
    STILLWATER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250 · revenue +90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
2
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
3
Adams County Pet Rescue

Rescue, care, and find homes for abandoned and/or abused animals.

Animals
4
K9 Hurricane's Heroes Inc

K9 hurricane's heroes, a federally recognized, non-profit organization, provides "retired law enforcement and military dogs" with subsidized veterinary care so they can live a long and healthy life. often these incredible dogs are the…

Animals
5
Dove Lewis Emergency Animal Hospital Inc

Founded in 1973, dove lewis emergency animal hospital, inc. (dovelewis) is one of the premier veterinary medical service organizations in the us and the only 24/7 not-for-profit animal emergency, critical care, and specialty hospital in…

Animals
6
Animal Rescue Force Inc

Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.

Animals
7
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
8
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
9
God's Dogs Rescue

Animal rescue

Human Services
10
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
11
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Rolling Dog Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST DUNSTANS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3,500 · OtherST DUNSTANS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCIMARRON VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,070 · OtherCIMARRON VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $1,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSETON HALL LAW SCHOOL: $1,700 · OtherSETON HALL LAW SCHOOLMISSION OF HOPE: $1,600 · OtherMISSION OF HOPEST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH: $1,350 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCHPAYNE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $1,290 · OtherPAYNE COUNTY UNITED WAYOUR DAILY BREAD: $1,200 · OtherOUR DAILY BREADMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $925 · OtherTHE HOUNDS CLUB - LOYOLA UNIV: $850 · OtherPSHIP MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH NORTH NJ: $775 · OtherREDEEMER CHURCH: $720 · Other+10 more: $3,780 · Other+10 morePRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC: $3,500 · EducationPRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INCGREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC: $1,150 · EducationGREENS FARMS ACADEMY IN…NICHOLS COLLEGE: $975 · EducationNICHOLS COLLEGEUniversity of Dayton: $975 · EducationUniversity of DaytonWEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $975 · EducationWEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY…TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $975 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE…AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $700 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD IN…+1 more: $250 · EducationFREE TO LIVE INC: $3,150 · AnimalsFREE TO LIVE INCTHE ROLLING DOG FARM: $1,400 · AnimalsTHE ROLLING DOG FARMPETS FOR PATRIOTS INC: $1,300 · AnimalsPETS FOR PATRIOTS INCFlying Fur Animal Rescue: $1,200 · AnimalsFlying Fur Animal Resc…Tiny Paws Kitten Rescue Inc: $1,110 · AnimalsTiny Paws Kitten Rescu…FETCH FIDO A FLIGHT INC: $915 · AnimalsFETCH FIDO A FLIGHT IN…STILLWATER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $1,800 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 · Human ServicesPARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC: $975 · Crime & LegalEQUAL JUSTICE AMERICA INC: $700 · Crime & LegalWarrior Dog Foundation: $1,015 · Youth DevelopmentNOURISHNJ INC: $925 · Food & Nutrition
Other$21,510Education$9,500Animals$9,075Human Services$2,400Crime & Legal$1,675Youth Development$1,015Food & Nutrition$925

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFREE TO LIVE INC: $3,150 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTILLWATER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $1,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROLLING DOG FARM: $1,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPETS FOR PATRIOTS INC: $1,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFlying Fur Animal Rescue: $1,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC: $1,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTiny Paws Kitten Rescue Inc: $1,110 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWarrior Dog Foundation: $1,015 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNICHOLS COLLEGE: $975 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC: $975 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $975 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $975 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $975 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHNJ INC: $925 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFETCH FIDO A FLIGHT INC: $915 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE AMERICA INC: $700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRANDOLPH CHEMICAL ENGINE CO 3: $475 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO LIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds STILLWATER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ROLLING DOG FARM ↗
  • Who funds PETS FOR PATRIOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Flying Fur Animal Rescue ↗
  • Who funds GREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Tiny Paws Kitten Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds Warrior Dog Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NICHOLS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHNJ INC ↗
  • Who funds FETCH FIDO A FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH CHEMICAL ENGINE CO 3 ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kirkpatrick Foundatio…Verizon FoundationChubb Charitable Foun…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …
Kirkpatrick Foundation IncOK13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alden H Vose Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alden H Vose Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Nourishnj Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Partners for Women and Justice Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Nichols College: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alden H Vose’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home