Skip to content
Alcibie Alliance Incorporated at a glance

· Private foundation

Alcibie Alliance Incorporated

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$158k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Civil Rights$1.3MCrime & Legal$925kEducation$900kPhilanthropy$785kYouth Development$650kHuman Services$625kArts & Culture$260kEmployment$165kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $953k
$60,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE$158,333
BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO$100,000
YOUTH TOGETHER$100,000
SOLIDAGO FOUNDATION$100,000
CRITICAL RESISTANCE$80,000
SCHOOL OF UNITY AND LIBERATION$80,000
COMMUNITY ASSET DEVELOPMENT RE-DEFINING EDUCATION$75,000
HOMIES UNIDOS INC$60,000
TIDES CENTER$50,000
EDUCATION FOR LIBERATION NETWORK$50,000
LEGAL SERVICES FOR PRISONERS WITH CHILDREN$46,000
KENDRA ALEXANDER FOUNDATION$33,000
THE FREEDOM ARCHIVES$30,000
FACTS EDUCATION FUND$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Black Organizing Project: $125k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%Education for Liberation Network: $50k → 21%EDUCATION FOR LIBERATION NETWORK: $50k → 4%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT: $100k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%EDUCATION FOR LIBERATION NETWORK: $50k → 4%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT: $100k → 10%Tides Center: $50k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $158k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $83k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $75k → 10%CURY J: $75k → 10%CURY J: $75k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $158k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 17 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$5.2M
$290k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-13%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ
    5× · 2020–2024 · $625k · revenue +358%
  • CR
    Critical Resistance
    5× · 2020–2024 · $567k · revenue +136%
  • YT
    Youth Together Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • NEO Philanthropy Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +27%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • TC
    THOUSAND CURRENTS
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Grassroots Power Project

GPP works within and across social movement sectorsto foster greater alignment around shared goals and strategies for transformational change.Through a combination of strategic consulting and political education, our team helps groups make…

Education
3
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
4
Root Change Inc

Root change's mission is to bring people together to question assumptions, think deeply, test ideas, and lead the way to a world built on social justice principles.

Employment
5
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
6
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
7
The Conversationalist
—
8
Lead Liberated

Through coaching and group facilitation, leaders of color heal from racism, develop skills to identify & interrupt racism in personal leadership, organizational practices & policies, and produce antiracist solutions in partnership with…

Education
9
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
10
Trial Impact Project

Advancing social justice by focusing on groundbreaking trial work and innovative collaboration across private, public and academic sectors. Our trial lawyers, veterans of historic cases, work closely with the next generation of leaders in…

Crime & Legal
11
Move to Amend

Move to Amend is a coalition of hundreds of organizations and hundreds of thousands of individuals committed to social and economic justice, ending corporate rule, and building a vibrant democracy that is genuinely accountable to the…

Civil Rights
12
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thousand Currents; the most unlike its peers is Kendra Alexander Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ: $625,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORA…The Black Organizing Project Inc: $525,000 · Human ServicesThe Black Organizing Project I…TIDES CENTER: $250,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTEREDUCATION FOR LIBERATION NETWORK: $150,000 · Human ServicesEDUCATION FOR LIBERATION NETWO…University of San Francisco: $500,000 · EducationUniversity of San…COMMUNITY ASSET DEVELOPMENT RE-DEFINING EDUCATION: $400,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY ASSET D…Youth Together Inc: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentYouth Together In…School of Unity and Liberation: $400,000 · Youth DevelopmentSchool of Unity a…Critical Resistance: $566,668 · Crime & LegalCritical Resistan…HOMIES UNIDOS INC: $325,000 · Crime & LegalHOMIES UNIDOS INCNetwork on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children: $255,000 · OtherNetwork on Women in…Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…Kendra Alexander Foundation: $165,000 · OtherKendra Alexander Fo…RESOURCE GENERATION INC: $75,000 · OtherRESOURCE GENERATION…WOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $60,000 · OtherWOMEN DONORS NETWOR…FACTS EDUCATION FUND: $103,000 · OtherFACTS EDUCATION FUN…NEO Philanthropy Inc: $100,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy In…THOUSAND CURRENTS: $50,000 · Other+3 more: $60,000 · Other+3 moreSOLIDAGO FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Community ImprovementThe Freedom Archives: $260,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$1,550,000Education$900,000Youth Development$900,000Crime & Legal$891,668Other$968,000Community Improvement$300,000Arts & Culture$260,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ: $625,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetCritical Resistance: $566,668 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetThe Black Organizing Project Inc: $525,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Together Inc: $500,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetSchool of Unity and Liberation: $400,000 over 5y, 66% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSET DEVELOPMENT RE-DEFINING EDUCATION: $400,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetHOMIES UNIDOS INC: $325,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetSOLIDAGO FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetThe Freedom Archives: $260,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetNetwork on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children: $255,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKendra Alexander Foundation: $165,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetEDUCATION FOR LIBERATION NETWORK: $150,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetFACTS EDUCATION FUND: $103,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESOURCE GENERATION INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundWillow Redistribution…The Heising-Simons Fo…NEO Philanthropy IncTides FoundationThe California Endowm…East Bay Community Fo…The San Francisco Fou…Tides CenterThe California Wellne…California Community …
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Willow Redistribution Foundation · The Heising-Simons Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Foundation · The California Endowment · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Tides Center · The California Wellness Foundation · California Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alcibie Alliance Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alcibie Alliance Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alcibie Alliance Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Alcibie Alliance Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alcibie Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home