Skip to content
Alchemy Charitable Foundation Co Johnson Financial Grp LLC at a glance

· Private foundation

Alchemy Charitable Foundation Co Johnson Financial Grp LLC

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$794k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$720k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$1.5MArts & Culture$215kEnvironment$163kInternational$85kFood & Nutrition$25kPhilanthropy$15kHousing & Shelter$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
  • $250k+1 grant · $720k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALISH COAST MARINE & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION$720,000
THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS$29,000
WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE$25,000
COLORADO WEST LAND TRUST$10,000
UTAH OPEN LANDS$5,000
THE PUTNEY SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 9% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GRAND CANYON TRUST: $9k → 16%HOSPITAL ALBERT SCHWEITZER: $10k → 11%SALISH COAST MARINE & WILFDLIFE CONSERVATION: $728k → 8%LONG ISLAND URBAN LACROSSE INC: $1k → 6%THE ENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE: $75k → 14%RURAL UTAH PROJECT: $10k → 8%ASPEN INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $52k → 7%COLORADO WEST LAND TRUST: $10k → 11%NEW ERA COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%PACIFIC WILD: $10k → 9%SITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $6k → 8%THE PUTNEY SCHOOL ELM LEA FARM: $25k → 11%THE BIOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%SALISH COAST MARINE & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: $720k → 8%RUP INC: $10k → 8%ASPEN HOMLESS SHELTER: $3k → 6%THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $52k → 7%COLORADO WEST LAND TRUST: $10k → 11%THE PUTNEY SCHOOL: $5k → 11%UTAH OPEN LANDS: $5k → 8%THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $52k → 7%COLORADO WEST LAND TRUST: $10k → 11%THE PUTNEY SCHOOL: $5k → 11%UTAH OPEN LANDS: $3k → 8%THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $30k → 7%GLADE PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 11%UTAH OPEN LANDS: $3k → 8%THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $29k → 7%GLADE PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 11%ARTBASE: $2k → 7%GLADE PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
NY
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$352k · 5 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +193% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$352k
$934k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+193%
+71%

Still filing today

80%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $725k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $87k · revenue +179%
  • MC
    MESA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +193%
  • UO
    UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • SC
    SALISH COAST MARINE & WILFDLIFE CONSERVATION
    one grant, 2022 · $728k
  • EO
    ENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +339%
  • TP
    THE PUTNEY SCHOOL ELM LEA FARM
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
2
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
3
Summit Land Conservancy

Summit land conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.

Environment
4
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
5
Wild Rockies Field Institute Inc

To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…

Education
6
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
7
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
8
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
9
Urban Land Conservancy

Urban land conservancy's mission is to acquire, develop, and/or preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs especially in high poverty, low-income, underserved, at-risk communities.

Community Improvement
10
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
11
Estes Valley Land Trust

The mission of estes valley land trust is to conserve land throughout the estes valley and surrounding areas for current and future generations.

Environment
12
Grand Teton Association

The mission of the association is to inspire "deeper connection, better understanding, and enduring support for our public lands."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesa County Land Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Biophilia Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALISH COAST MARINE & WILFDLIFE CONSERVATION: $728,000 · OtherSALISH COAST MARINE & WILFDLIFE CONSERVATIONSALISH COAST MARINE & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: $720,000 · OtherSALISH COAST MARINE & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION+11 more: $97,000 · Other+11 moreTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $213,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS CAM…+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $87,000 · EnvironmentMESA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 · EnvironmentTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentSan Juan Citizens Alliance: $5,000 · Environment+1 more: $3,500 · EnvironmentENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE: $75,000 · InternationalGRANT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · InternationalTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BIOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · AnimalsNew Era Colorado Foundation: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,545,000Arts & Culture$215,000Environment$145,000International$85,000Philanthropy$15,000Animals$10,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS: $213,500 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $87,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE: $75,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetMESA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BIOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew Era Colorado Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRANT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSan Juan Citizens Alliance: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPUTNEY SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Base: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community Found…Sacharuna FoundationAspen Business Center…The Chicago Community…Colorado Gives Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…
Aspen Community FoundationCO15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Sacharuna Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Colorado Gives Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alchemy Charitable Foundation Co Johnson Financial Grp LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alchemy Charitable Foundation Co Johnson Financial Grp LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alchemy Charitable Foundation Co Johnson Financial Grp LLC?

    Find your warmest path to Alchemy Charitable Foundation Co Johnson Financial Grp LLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alchemy Charitable Foundation Co Johnson Financial Grp LLC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home