Skip to content
Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$615k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$185k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$271kFood & Nutrition$260kHuman Services$125kPhilanthropy$80kCommunity Improvement$60kHealth$55kEducation$51kCrime & Legal$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $245k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Grand Oshkosh$185,000
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation$60,000
Namaste Direct$35,000
George Mark Children's House$25,000
Peace in Schools$25,000
Feeding America - Oregon$20,000
Feeding America - Eastern Wisconsin$20,000
Feeding America - Food Banks of Roc$20,000
Feeding America - Second Harvest Fo$20,000
Kara$15,000
Washington Park Early Learning Cent$15,000
Tustin Area Council for Fine Arts$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Children's Center$15,000
Xela$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Commonweal: $10k → 8%Bags 4 Kids: $5k → 18%Community Clothes Closet: $8k → 6%Commonweal: $10k → 8%Community Clothes Closet: $5k → 6%Reach A Child: $5k → 10%Good Karma Bikes: $5k → 8%Reach A Child: $5k → 10%Clackamas Women's Services: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$635k · 18 repeat orgs$329k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against -89% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$635k
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
-89%

Still filing today

78%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GRAND OSHKOSH INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +178%
  • NF
    NAMASTE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +19%
  • GM
    George Mark Childrens Fund
    2× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
  • OA
    Oshkosh Area Community Foundation - Food Coop
    one grant, 2020 · $38k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kidworks Community Development Corp

Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.

Human Services
2
Museum of Childrens Art

The Museum of Children's Art (MOCHA) in Oakland aims to ensure the arts are a fundamental part of the community by providing quality, hands-on art experiences, particularly for children at risk academically or in underserved areas. Their…

Arts & Culture
3
Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy
4
Cycles of Change

Our mission is to broaden access to cycling as a primary means of safe, accessible, and sustainable transportation. our education programs and free resources empower youth & adults to get on and stay on bikes.

Youth Development
5
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
6
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
7
The Wichita Children's Home

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…

Human Services
8
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
9
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
10
Center for Youth Mental Health

The Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health exists to expand access to quality evidence-based youth mental health support as quickly as possible.

Health
11
Family Service Agency of Waukesha County Inc

Building stronger communities, strengthening families, and empowering individuals through compassionate, life changing programs and mental health services.

Human Services
12
Childrens Advocacy Center of Collin County Inc

The mission of children's advocacy center of collin county is to provide safety, healing, and justice to children victimized by abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soil Born Farm Urban Agriculture Project; the most unlike its peers is Bags4Kids LaJuana Moser. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAMASTE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherNAMASTE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOshkosh Area Community Foundation - Food Coop: $37,500 · OtherOshkosh Area Community Foundation - Food CoopIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTUSTIN AREA COUNCIL FOR FINE ARTS: $30,000 · OtherTUSTIN AREA COUNCIL FOR FINE ARTSIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherFeeding America-Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County CA: $25,000 · OtherKARA: $25,000 · OtherFeeding America - Second Harvest Fo: $20,000 · OtherFeeding America - Food Banks of Roc: $20,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $20,000 · Other+21 more: $128,500 · Other+21 moreTHE GRAND OSHKOSH INC: $210,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GRAND OSHKOSH INC+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePEACE IN SCHOOLS: $40,000 · Human ServicesPEACE IN SCH…COMMONWEAL: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMONWEALPROJECT LEMONADE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT LEMO…COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $12,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CL…Reach A Child Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesReach A Chil…Bags4Kids LaJuana Moser: $5,000 · Human ServicesGOOD KARMA BIKES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $50,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationWASHINGTON PARK EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $15,000 · EducationRIPON COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationChildrens Center: $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$511,000Arts & Culture$215,000Human Services$112,500Philanthropy$75,000Health$50,000Education$45,000Crime & Legal$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GRAND OSHKOSH INC: $210,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNAMASTE FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPEACE IN SCHOOLS: $40,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetChildrens Center: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTUSTIN AREA COUNCIL FOR FINE ARTS: $30,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetKARA: $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMONWEAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGleaners of Clackamas County Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON PARK EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPROJECT LEMONADE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $12,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKLAAS KIDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetReach A Child Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBags4Kids LaJuana Moser: $5,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetGOOD KARMA BIKES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Jose Museum of Quilts & Textiles: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOIL BORN FARM URBAN AGRICULTURE PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

OCF Joseph E Weston P…Clark FoundationWheeler FoundationThe Robert D and Marc…The Jackson FoundationThe Harold & Arlene S…The Oregon Community …The Autzen FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…James and Shirley Rip…Sangham FoundationThe Holzman Foundation
OCF Joseph E Weston Public FoundationOR17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Clark Foundation · Wheeler Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · James and Shirley Rippey Family Foundation · Sangham Foundation · The Holzman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Clackamas Women's Services: 33% of income from government
  • Project Lemonade Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Community Transitional School: 7% of income from government
  • Childrens Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home