· Private foundation
Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $292k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $245k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Grand Oshkosh | $185,000 |
| Oshkosh Area Community Foundation | $60,000 |
| Namaste Direct | $35,000 |
| Peace in Schools | $25,000 |
| George Mark Children's House | $25,000 |
| Feeding America - Second Harvest Fo | $20,000 |
| Feeding America - Food Banks of Roc | $20,000 |
| Feeding America - Eastern Wisconsin | $20,000 |
| Feeding America - Oregon | $20,000 |
| Kara | $15,000 |
| Tustin Area Council for Fine Arts | $15,000 |
| Washington Park Early Learning Cent | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Children's Center | $15,000 |
| Xela | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against -89% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGTHE GRAND OSHKOSH INC2× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +178%
- NFNAMASTE FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +19%
- GMGeorge Mark Childrens Fund2× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $45k
- OAOshkosh Area Community Foundation - Food Coopone grant, 2020 · $38k
- FAFeeding America-Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County CAone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.
The Museum of Children's Art (MOCHA) in Oakland aims to ensure the arts are a fundamental part of the community by providing quality, hands-on art experiences, particularly for children at risk academically or in underserved areas. Their…
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
Our mission is to broaden access to cycling as a primary means of safe, accessible, and sustainable transportation. our education programs and free resources empower youth & adults to get on and stay on bikes.
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…
The Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health exists to expand access to quality evidence-based youth mental health support as quickly as possible.
Building stronger communities, strengthening families, and empowering individuals through compassionate, life changing programs and mental health services.
The mission of children's advocacy center of collin county is to provide safety, healing, and justice to children victimized by abuse and neglect.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soil Born Farm Urban Agriculture Project and the most unlike its peers is Bags4Kids LaJuana Moser. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GRAND OSHKOSH INC ↗
- Who funds OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NAMASTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds George Mark Childrens Fund ↗
- Who funds PEACE IN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Childrens Center ↗
- Who funds TUSTIN AREA COUNCIL FOR FINE ARTS ↗
- Who funds KARA ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMONWEAL ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON PARK EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Gleaners of Clackamas County Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LEMONADE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
- Who funds RIPON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Reach A Child Inc ↗
- Who funds KLAAS KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds San Jose Museum of Quilts & Textiles ↗
- Who funds Bags4Kids LaJuana Moser ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds SOIL BORN FARM URBAN AGRICULTURE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds GOOD KARMA BIKES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Clark Foundation · Wheeler Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · James and Shirley Rippey Family Foundation · Sangham Foundation · The Holzman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alberta S Kimball-Mary L Anhaltzer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- Childrens Center — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.