Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Albert Penick Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$117kHealth$107kPhilanthropy$77kArts & Culture$63kEducation$55kCivil Rights$23kYouth Development$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$583k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAST CANCER OPTIONS$5,000
WBGONEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC$5,000
BIG INDIAN-OLIVEREA FIRE CO INC$3,000
PHOENICIA LIBRARY$2,000
THE MAYA GOLD FOUNDATION INC$2,000
THE SAMADHI RECOVERY COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $9k → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$416k · 26 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
18

Total granted

$416k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+18%

Still filing today

46%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FV
    FROST VALLEY YMCA
    7× · 2017–2023 · $59k · revenue +42%
  • PH
    PINE HILL COMMUNITY CENTER LTD
    7× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +103%
  • BC
    BREAST CANCER OPTIONS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • A
    ASTRAEA
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF TANNERSVILLE ORGANIZATIO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MIDHUDSON VAL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catskill Public Library

A public library with locations in catskill and palenville, new york providing reference materials and various on-line services.

2
Peconic Public Broadcasting

Peconic Public Broadcasting is a public FM radio station located in Southampton, New York. The station services Long Island and coastal Connecticut and offers listeners both national and local programs.

3
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Fresh Air Fund

To provide nyc children from low-income families with cultural, recreational, and educational experiences at its camps and with volunteer host families and through year-round academic programs.

Recreation & Sports
5
Performance Space 122 Inc

See schedule operformance space new york is committed to promoting the arts (including performance, visual and all other contemporary arts), fostering artistic development (including through direct grants), advancing diversity in the field…

Arts & Culture
6
Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc

Caramoor's mission is to enrich the lives of audiences through innovative and diverse musical performances of the highest quality, mentor young professional musicians, and engage children through interactive educational experiences that…

Arts & Culture
7
Binghamton Philharmonic Inc

The mission of the Binghamton Philharmonic is building community through the power of live music.

Arts & Culture
8
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
9
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
10
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Astoria Performing Arts Center Inc

Providing means for performing artists to show skills.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of the Mid-Hudson Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is 23 Arts Initiative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDisease Research & AdvocacyUnion Benefit & Welfare Fun…Disability Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and Shelter S…Performing Arts ProductionFood Pantries and Hunger Re…Classical & World Music Ens…Social Change Advocacy Orga…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%9%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,734

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTH STAR FUND INC — $67,000 · OtherNORTH STAR FUND INCMILLS COLLEGE — $40,000 · OtherMILLS COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWBGONEWARK PUBLIC RADIO — $20,000 · OtherWBGONEWARK PUBLIC RADIOPLANNED PARENTHOOD MID-HUDSON VALLEY — $20,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD MID-HUDSON VALLEYTHE RUTH GOTTSCHO KIDNEY FOUNDATION — $16,000 · OtherTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 · OtherASTRAEA — $12,500 · OtherCATSKILL HERITAGE ALLIANCE — $12,000 · Other+26 more — $83,000 · Other+26 moreFROST VALLEY YMCA — $59,000 · Human ServicesFROST VALLEY…BREAST CANCER OPTIONS INC — $48,000 · HealthBREAST CANC…FAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC — $6,000 · HealthFAMILY OF W…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthPINE HILL COMMUNITY CENTER LTD — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsPINE HILL …NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureShandaken Theatrical Society Inc — $6,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $3,000 · Arts & Culture23 Arts Initiative Inc — $1,000 · Arts & CultureMAYA GOLD FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBig Indian Oliverea Fire Co Inc — $13,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$321,500Human Services$59,000Health$55,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Arts & Culture$30,000Youth Development$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$13,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC — $67,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFROST VALLEY YMCA — $59,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPINE HILL COMMUNITY CENTER LTD — $50,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetBREAST CANCER OPTIONS INC — $48,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAYA GOLD FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetTHE RUTH GOTTSCHO KIDNEY FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBig Indian Oliverea Fire Co Inc — $13,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetUlster Literacy Association Inc — $7,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC — $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetShandaken Theatrical Society Inc — $6,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENICIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $4,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE MID-HUDSON VALLEY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PATERSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget23 Arts Initiative Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH STAR FUND INC
  • Who funds FROST VALLEY YMCA
  • Who funds PINE HILL COMMUNITY CENTER LTD
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER OPTIONS INC
  • Who funds MILLS COLLEGE
  • Who funds NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC
  • Who funds MAYA GOLD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE RUTH GOTTSCHO KIDNEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Big Indian Oliverea Fire Co Inc
  • Who funds Ulster Literacy Association Inc
  • Who funds MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC
  • Who funds Shandaken Theatrical Society Inc
  • Who funds FAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC
  • Who funds PHOENICIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE MID-HUDSON VALLEY INC
  • Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC
  • Who funds RESERVOIR FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds THE PATERSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ulster Savings Charitable FoundationNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Hudson Valley Foundation for Youth Health · Kvistad Foundation · The Dyson Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Albert Penick Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 51%
  • Newark Public Radio Inc51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Albert Penick Fund?

Find your warmest path to Albert Penick Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph