Skip to content

· Private foundation

Albert Payson Terhune Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$67kAnimals$36kEducation$30kHealth$14kHuman Services$13kRecreation & Sports$11kEnvironment$2kHousing & Shelter$300
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,480
Median grant
3
States reached
$257k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARTNERS IN ANIMAL WELFARE$7,750
THE RAPTOR TRUST$5,618
THE MONTCLAIR FOUNDATION$4,800
THE MONTCLAIR HISTORY CENTER$4,698
FELICIAN UNIVERSITY$3,500
OASIS$2,625
MONTCLAIR PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,000
YOGI BERRA MUSEUM LEARNING CENTER$1,700
THE SEEING EYE$1,480
MONTCLAIR TROOP 12$1,400
Individual grant recipient$700
MONTCLAIR KIMBERLY ACADEMY$175
CUTCHOGUE-NEW SUFFOLK FREE LIBRARY$175
VERONA PUBLIC LIBRARY$175
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2k → 4%CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2k → 4%CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 4%OASIS: $3k → 12%OASIS: $2k → 12%OASIS: $1k → 12%OASIS: $1k → 12%OASIS: $1k → 12%YMCA OF MONTCLAIR: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 25 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
8

Total granted

$157k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+63%

Still filing today

48%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RAPTOR TRUST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +35%
  • MF
    Montclair Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +140%
  • TS
    THE SEEING EYE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MONTCLAIR ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • YO
    YMCA of Montclair NEW JERSEYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +63%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PASSAIC COUNTY PARKS
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Philips Academy Charter School of Paterson

We will provide a moral and rigorous education, accomplished in a hands-on, technology infused educational environment that will allow our students to attend college, while developing a commitment to global citizenship, environmental…

Education
3
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
4
Molloy University

Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

Education
5
Philips Academy Charter School Inc

Our mission is to inspire diverse learners in a rigorous and innovative environment that cultivates resilient leadership, intellectual curiosity, and thoughtful stewardship.

Education
6
The Rippowam Cisqua School Inc

Rippowam Cisqua School creates independent thinkers, confident communicators, and engaged leaders who respect and contribute meaningfully to a diverse and increasingly complex global society.

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Raritan Valley Community College

Raritan Valley Community College is an educational community that works to develop critical thinking, foster intellectual curiosity, promote leadership, encourage social responsibility and support personal growth.

Education
9
University of Mount Saint Vincent

Founded by the sisters of charity of new york, the university of mount saint vincent is an academically excellent, authentically inclusive, catholic and ecumenical liberal arts university. (cont. in sch.o)

Education
10
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
11
Montgomery Academy

K-12 school serving students with special needs.

—
12
The Craig School

To provide a strategy-based, comprehensive and challenging school experience for students with diagnosed learning disabilities

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Van Riper House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMontclair Foundation Inc: $20,025 · OtherMontclair Foundation IncTHE MONTCLAIR HISTORY CENTER: $12,098 · OtherTHE MONTCLAIR HISTORY CENTERFRIENDS OF WAYNE HISTORIC MUSEUMS: $6,920 · OtherFRIENDS OF WAYNE HISTORIC MUSEUMSWILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITY: $4,900 · OtherWILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITYMONTCLAIR PUBLIC LIBRARY: $4,700 · Other+13 more: $14,620 · Other+13 moreTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $20,118 · AnimalsTHE RAPTOR TRUSTPARTNERS IN ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $9,000 · AnimalsPARTNERS IN ANIMAL WE…MT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $4,000 · AnimalsMT PLEASANT ANIMAL SH…THE SEEING EYE INC: $9,074 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE …OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $7,825 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN…Chilton Medical Center Foundation Inc: $4,750 · Human ServicesChilton Medical…YMCA of Montclair NEW JERSEY: $2,500 · Human ServicesYMCA of Montcla…FELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $1,800 · EducationTrustees of Hamilton College: $1,675 · EducationCUTCHOGUE - NEW SUFFOLK FREE LIBRARY: $1,675 · EducationMONTCLAIR KIMBERLEY ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $1,150 · Education+1 more: $300 · EducationFRIENDS OF YOGI INC: $9,300 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $300 · Arts & CultureEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $2,500 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF PASSAIC COUNTY PARKS: $1,200 · Environment
Other$91,263Animals$33,118Human Services$24,149Education$10,100Arts & Culture$9,600Community Improvement$2,500Environment$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $20,118 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMontclair Foundation Inc: $20,025 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOGI INC: $9,300 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $9,074 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $9,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $7,825 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChilton Medical Center Foundation Inc: $4,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA of Montclair NEW JERSEY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $1,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College: $1,675 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCUTCHOGUE - NEW SUFFOLK FREE LIBRARY: $1,675 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PASSAIC COUNTY PARKS: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTCLAIR KIMBERLEY ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $1,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVAN RIPER HOUSE INC: $300 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE WINSTON SCHOOL: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RAPTOR TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Montclair Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YOGI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Chilton Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FELICIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA of Montclair NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
  • Who funds CUTCHOGUE - NEW SUFFOLK FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PASSAIC COUNTY PARKS ↗
  • Who funds MONTCLAIR KIMBERLEY ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VAN RIPER HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WINSTON SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · McMullen Family Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Ej Grassmann Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albert Payson Terhune Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albert Payson Terhune Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Montclair Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Albert Payson Terhune Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Albert Payson Terhune Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Albert Payson Terhune’s filings →

More from the funding graph