Skip to content
Albert M & Miriam Rodstein Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Albert M & Miriam Rodstein Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$608
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$608
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Public Benefit$25kPhilanthropy$23kArts & Culture$21kHealth$12kCivil Rights$12kEducation$11kInternational$10kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$608
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER$608
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRUSTBRIDGE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$74k · 15 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$74k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+51%

Still filing today

60%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $16k · revenue +107%
  • MR
    MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER
    3× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • AH
    ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • PV
    PROJECT VERITAS
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +158%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
5
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
8
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
12
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TURNING POINT USA INC: $15,640 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA: $10,700 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIAPRAGER UNIVERSITY: $9,940 · OtherPRAGER UNIVERSITYJEWISH FEDERATION OF S PALM BEACH: $9,900 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF S PALM BEACHIndividual grant recipient: $9,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROJECT VERITAS: $9,300 · OtherPROJECT VERITASINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $9,200 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INCREFORM CONGREGATION K ISRAEL: $7,202 · OtherREFORM CONGREGATION K ISRAEL+15 more: $7,960 · Other+15 moreMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $10,248 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESE…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,400 · Arts & CultureThe United…THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureLEGAL INSURRECTION FOUNDATION: $9,300 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 · Civil RightsJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $9,300 · Public BenefitTrustBridge Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $3,400 · Community ImprovementABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,150 · HealthTHE AMYLOIDOSIS FOUNDATION: $299 · Health
Other$89,142Arts & Culture$12,248Civil Rights$9,800Public Benefit$9,300Human Services$5,000Community Improvement$3,400Health$2,449

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $15,640 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $10,248 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $9,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL INSURRECTION FOUNDATION: $9,300 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $9,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustBridge Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $3,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC: $950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $910 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INC: $640 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $640 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMYLOIDOSIS FOUNDATION: $299 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Albert M & Miriam Rodstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Albert M & Miriam Rodstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • TrustBridge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Albert M & Miriam Rodstein Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Albert M & Miriam Rodstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Albert M & Miriam Rodstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home