Skip to content
Alberici Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Alberici Foundation

This organization operates exclusively for the benefit, to perform the functions, and to carry out the purposes of the st.

$37k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$4.6MEducation$541kEnvironment$250kArts & Culture$71kHuman Services$58kPhilanthropy$18k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $25,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $37,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HCSO BENEVOLENCE ASSOCIATION: $8k → 16%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $25k → 21%FOSTER VILLAGE INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 74% of Alberici Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 52%.

Alberici Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
3
University of Louisville Physicians Inc

Provide professional medical services in a variety of medical specialties and disciplines in accordance with the corporation's charitable mission: strengthen and broaden the range of skills and patient populations available for physicians…

Health
4
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
5
Ssm-Sluh Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
6
Ochsner Health System

We serve, heal, lead, educate and innovate. ochsner will be a global medical and academic leader who will save and change lives. we will shape the future of healthcare through our integrated health system, fueled by the passion and…

—
7
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
8
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
10
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
11
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation St Louis; the most unlike its peers is Austin Chinese-American Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUIS: $2,625,000 · OtherSSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUISCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONDE SMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $225,000 · OtherDE SMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL+2 more: $22,500 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOUIS: $1,250,000 · HealthMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOU…BJC HEALTH SYSTEM DBA BJC HEALTHCARE: $150,000 · HealthBJC HEALTH SYSTEM DBA BJC HEAL…+4 more: $78,661 · HealthOklahoma State University Foundation: $250,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation: $15,000 · EducationAustin Chinese-American Network: $15,000 · Education+3 more: $26,000 · EducationMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $250,000 · EnvironmentMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $21,079 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $25,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER VILLAGE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHCSO BENEVOLENCE ASSOCIATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesUnited Way of Greater Houston: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,372,500Health$1,478,661Education$306,000Environment$250,000Arts & Culture$71,079Human Services$42,500Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUIS: $2,625,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOUIS: $1,250,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBJC HEALTH SYSTEM DBA BJC HEALTHCARE: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $28,661 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $21,079 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRocky Mountain Adventist Healthcare Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAustin Chinese-American Network: $15,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTER VILLAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHCSO BENEVOLENCE ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitabl…Edward Jones Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …United Way of Greater…American Cancer Socie…United Way WorldwideThe Pfizer Foundation…Shell USA Company Fou…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…
Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN14.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alberici Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alberici Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alberici Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alberici Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $24k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alberici’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home