Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Alberici Foundation

This organization operates exclusively for the benefit, to perform the functions, and to carry out the purposes of the st.

$37k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.

Health$4.6MEducation$541kEnvironment$250kArts & Culture$71kHuman Services$58kPhilanthropy$18k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $25,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $37,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HCSO BENEVOLENCE ASSOCIATION: $8k → 16%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $25k → 21%FOSTER VILLAGE INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 74% of Alberici Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 52% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Alberici Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
3
University of Louisville Physicians Inc

Provide professional medical services in a variety of medical specialties and disciplines in accordance with the corporation's charitable mission: strengthen and broaden the range of skills and patient populations available for physicians…

Health
4
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
5
Ssm-Sluh Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
6
Ochsner Health System

We serve, heal, lead, educate and innovate. ochsner will be a global medical and academic leader who will save and change lives. we will shape the future of healthcare through our integrated health system, fueled by the passion and…

—
7
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
8
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
10
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
11
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Austin Chinese-American Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Asian American Advocacy & H…United Way FederationsPublic School District Foun…Child and Family ServicesFallen First Responder Supp…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%9%5–10yr16%5%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr16%23%35–55yr24%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr16%0%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr16%1%35–55yr24%70%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,466

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUIS — $2,625,000 · OtherSSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUISCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $500,000 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONDE SMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL — $225,000 · OtherDE SMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL+2 more — $22,500 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOUIS — $1,250,000 · HealthMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOU…BJC HEALTH SYSTEM DBA BJC HEALTHCARE — $150,000 · HealthBJC HEALTH SYSTEM DBA BJC HEAL…+4 more — $78,661 · HealthOklahoma State University Foundation — $250,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation — $15,000 · EducationAustin Chinese-American Network — $15,000 · Education+3 more — $26,000 · EducationMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $250,000 · EnvironmentMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $21,079 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $25,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER VILLAGE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesHCSO BENEVOLENCE ASSOCIATION — $7,500 · Human ServicesLITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Houston — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,372,500Health$1,478,661Education$306,000Environment$250,000Arts & Culture$71,079Human Services$42,500Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUIS — $2,625,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ST LOUIS — $1,250,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBJC HEALTH SYSTEM DBA BJC HEALTHCARE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $28,661 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $21,079 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRocky Mountain Adventist Healthcare Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Chinese-American Network — $15,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOSTER VILLAGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHCSO BENEVOLENCE ASSOCIATION — $7,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitabl…Edward Jones Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …United Way of Greater…American Cancer Socie…United Way WorldwideThe Pfizer Foundation…Shell USA Company Fou…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…
Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN14.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alberici Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alberici Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alberici Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $24k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines